This  is all pathetic. My recent short book, the final section,  features
a powerful empirical argument that would, if made good use of,
defeat each and every case that homosexuals and their supporters 
care to make. Instead:
 
(1) people are too disinterested to actually read the material
and
(2) they prefer to go down in flames while making use of arguments
that are guaranteed to fail.
 
I am anti-Left on this issue, for many solid reasons, but also count  me
as disgusted with the wimpy milquetoast conservative Right and the 
ridiculously  uninformed and obsolete Religious Right.
With friends like these, who needs enemies?
 
Billy
 
==================
 
 
 
 
 
The American Conservative
 
 
Gay-Rights McCarthyism Takes Brendan Eich Scalp
By _Rod  Dreher_ (http://www.theamericanconservative.com/author/rod-dreher) 
 • _April 3, 2014, 3:39 PM_ 
(http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/brendan-eich-gay-rights-mccarthyism/)
  

 
 
Are you now or have you ever been against gay marriage? _Shoot one Brendan 
Eich, teach 1,000:_ 
(https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2014/04/03/brendan-eich-steps-down-as-mozilla-ceo/)
  
_Mozilla_ (http://www.mozilla.org/mission/)  prides itself on  being held 
to a different standard and, this past week, we didn’t live up to  it. We 
know why people are hurt and angry, and they are right: it’s because we  haven’
t stayed true to ourselves. 
We didn’t act like you’d expect Mozilla to act. We didn’t move fast enough 
 to engage with people once the controversy started. We’re sorry. We must 
do  better. 
Brendan Eich has chosen to step down from his role as CEO. He’s made this  
decision for Mozilla and our community. 
Mozilla believes both in equality and freedom of speech. Equality is  
necessary for meaningful speech. And you need free speech to fight for  
equality. 
Figuring out how to stand for both at the same time can be hard. 
Our organizational culture reflects diversity and inclusiveness. We welcome 
 contributions from everyone regardless of age, culture, ethnicity, gender, 
 gender-identity, language, race, sexual orientation, geographical location 
and  religious views. Mozilla supports equality for all.
No you don’t, you liars. You don’t want contributions from anyone who doesn
’t  subscribe to gay-rights orthodoxy. You don’t care how they behave, or 
how they  treat others. All you care about is what they think — or how they 
once thought,  even after they have long since ceased being a threat to you 
and your political  goals. You don’t want them in your workplace. No 
traditional Christians, Jews,  or Muslims need apply — or if they do, they had 
better stay deeply closeted. 
Is this really the world you fought for? 
Meanwhile, a Google board member of the poverty relief charity World Vision 
 today _resigned  under pressure_ 
(http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/world-vision-board-member-resigns-gay-uproar-23167301)
  from gay rights 
activists. [UPDATE: That's a  badly written sentence. I meant to say that a 
Google director who is a board  member of the poverty relief charity World 
Vision resigned under pressure from  gay rights activists.] 
This is the emerging face of gay-rights activism: hateful, intolerant,  
illiberal, persecutorial. They’re not going to stop at Brendan Eich. Because  
error has no rights, nor do people who hold to it. 
Remember the Law of Merited Impossibility: What happened to Brendan Eich is 
 not going to happen to you, and when it does, boy, will you deserve it. 
UPDATE: Yeah, it’s personal for me. The same principle that  made Brendan 
Eich unemployable at Mozilla, despite his incredible achievements  in his 
field, and his public pledge to treat gay people fairly, makes me and  many of 
my friends and colleagues unemployable. I do not want to live in a world  in 
which gay people get fired for their sexuality, when their sexuality has  
nothing to do with their ability to do their job. But the kind of people who  
ousted Brendan Eich want to live in a world in which expressing the “wrong”
  opinion about same-sex marriage makes one unemployable, even if that 
opinion has  nothing to do with their ability to execute their professional 
responsibilities.  This is not going to end well. 
UPDATE.2: Michelle Goldberg, writing at The Nation,  _slams  the 
anti-liberal left_ 
(http://www.thenation.com/blog/179160/cancelcolbert-and-return-anti-liberal-left#)
 : 
Call it left-wing anti-liberalism: the idea, captured by Herbert Marcuse in 
 his 1965 _essay_ 
(http://www.marcuse.org/herbert/pubs/60spubs/65repressivetolerance.htm) 
“Repressive Tolerance,”  that social justice demands curbs 
on freedom of expression. “[I]t is possible  to define the direction in which 
prevailing institutions, policies, opinions  would have to be changed in 
order to improve the chance of a peace which is  not identical with cold war 
and a little hot war, and a satisfaction of needs  which does not feed on 
poverty, oppression, and exploitation,” he wrote.  “Consequently, it is also 
possible to identify policies, opinions, movements  which would promote this 
chance, and those which would do the opposite.  Suppression of the 
regressive ones is a prerequisite for the strengthening of  the progressive 
ones.” 
Note here both the belief that correct opinions can be dispassionately  
identified, and the blithe confidence in the wisdom of those empowered to do  
the suppressing. This kind of thinking is only possible at certain moments:  
when liberalism seems to have failed but the right is not yet in charge. At  
such times, old-fashioned liberal values like free speech and robust, open  
debate seem like tainted adjuncts of an oppressive system, and it’s still  
possible for radicals to believe that the ideas suppressed as hateful won’t 
be  their own.

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to