Times of India
   
Election results 2014: Reverse polarization is why Muslim votes did  not 
count in UP and Bihar
May 17,  2014
 
 
Despite a concerted effort by "secular" parties to get Muslims  to vote en 
bloc against BJP, the saffron challenger prevailed largely because of  what 
is being called "reverse polarization".

In both UP and Bihar, which  have a significant population of Muslims, the 
BJP pulled off big wins. Talking  to TOI after the results were declared, 
BJP general-secretary Amit Shah said his  party succeeded "because the number 
of people who are not part of the politics  of vote bank are much more".

As per the 2011 Census, Muslims are nearly  15% of India's 1.2 billion 
people. In 35 seats, they number around one in three  voters or more. In 38 
other seats, Muslims are 21-30% of the electorate. If the  145 seats where they 
are 11-20% are added to this, Muslim voters have the  ability to influence 
the outcome in 218 seats. UP and Bihar, which have 120  seats between them, 
have 18% and 16% share of Muslims respectively. So the  "secular" gamble was 
not unreasonable.

In UP alone, out of 80 seats, 32  have a Muslim population of close to 15% 
or more. Yet, despite a serious pitch  as the only force that could stop 
Modi, SP won only two seats, with 30 going to  BJP.

Curiously, the saffron party swept all eight constituencies,  including 
Saharanpur, Amroha, Shrawasti, Bijnor, Muzaffarnagar, Moradabad and  Rampur, 
where the Muslim population hovers around 40%. For the first time since  
Independence, UP has no Muslim MP.

The trend is similar in Bihar where  out of the 17 seats where Muslims have 
more than 15% of votes, BJP has won 12.  The remaining five have been 
shared by the RJD-Congress-NCP combine and JD(U)  which has got one seat.

Even in Maharashtra, which has Muslims  constituting 14% of its population, 
BJP and its allies have swept the polls  winning 42 out of 48 seats. The 
combine also won all the seats with considerable  Muslim voters. In Mumbai and 
other Muslim-populated areas across Maharashtra,  low polling in Muslim 
pockets and votes split between Congress-NCP and AAP made  Muslim votes 
ineffective.

"In the Muslim-dominated Govandi area of Mumbai  North-East polling was 40% 
while in the Gujarati-dominated Mulund, in the same  constituency, it was 
60%. And Muslim votes got divided between AAP's Medha  Patkar and sitting MP 
NCP's Sanjay Dina Patil. This gave BJP's Kirit Somaiya a  comfortable win," 
said Rais Shaikh, Samajwadi Party councillor from  Govandi.

Pollsters, going by trends of past elections, say the Muslim  vote is most 
effective where it is around 10% of the electorate, big enough to  sway the 
result in a multi-cornered contest, by consolidating for a single  
candidate. Ironically, where Muslim presence is over 20%, their votes have been 
 
mostly ineffective. This is because of a multiplicity of Muslim candidates that 
 
divide their votes. In such constituencies, say psephologists, there is 
often  counter-polarization of Hindu votes. In a polarized UP, it's the latter 
that  seems to have helped the BJP. "In the future, Muslims will have to 
change their  strategy and keep their options open," said M A Khalid of All 
India Milli  Council. 

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to