Your Holiness, Bibi was right – Jesus spoke  Hebrew!

_R.  Steven Notley | Ops & Blogs | The Times of Israel_ 
(http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/bibi-was-right-jesus-spoke-hebrew/#ixzz33EUdTeiJ)
 
 
 
May 28, 2014,
 
The _recent  tête-à-tête_ 
(http://www.timesofisrael.com/pope-wraps-up-delicate-mideast-pilgrimage/)  
between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Pope 
Francis has  set the blogosphere atwitter. While their exchange was 
amicable, the prime  minister’s correction of the holy father ushered into 
public 
discourse a subject  more at home in the arcane halls of scholarly 
deliberation.  
What language did Jesus speak?  
 
Their differences of opinion reflect changes taking  place among scholars, 
but which have yet to make their way fully to mainstream,  popular 
understanding. Beginning in the middle of the nineteenth century a  mistaken 
notion 
took hold that has by-and-large continued to dominate both  scholarly and 
popular opinion. 
Today many still assume that by the first century C.E.  Hebrew was a dead 
language, or existed only among sparse pockets of the highly  educated – not 
dissimilar to Medieval Latin. 
As a consequence, it is commonly thought that Jesus  only knew Aramaic. 
Yet, the results of a century of archaeological  evidence have challenged 
this assumption and brought a sea change of  understanding regarding the 
linguistic environment of first-century Judaea. 
The inscriptional and literary evidence reflects a  reality not unlike what 
we find with the Dead Sea Scrolls. Of the 700  non-biblical texts from the 
Qumran library, 120 are in Aramaic and 28 in Greek,  while 550 scrolls were 
written in Hebrew. 
Jesus lived in a trilingual land in which Hebrew and  Aramaic were widely 
in use. A relative latecomer, Greek was introduced in the  4th century B.C.E. 
with the arrival of Alexander the Great and his Hellenistic  successors. 
By the first century C.E. Aramaic served as the lingua  franca of the Near 
East, and there is little question that Jesus knew and spoke  Aramaic. 
Hebrew, on the other hand, was in more limited use as the language of  
discourse 
among the Jewish people. 
The New Testament presents Jesus knowledgeable of both  written and spoken 
Hebrew. 
He is portrayed reading and teaching from the Bible,  and there are clear 
indications in these accounts that he used the Hebrew  Scriptures. In this he 
was not alone. We have not a single example of a Jewish  teacher of the 
first century in the land of Israel teaching from any other  version of the 
scriptures than Hebrew. 
In addition, Jesus is often described speaking in  parables. These were 
delivered orally in popular, non-scholarly settings. They  were also in Hebrew. 
Outside of the Gospels, story-parables of the type  associated with Jesus 
are to be found only in rabbinic literature, and without  exception they are 
all in Hebrew. We have not a single parable in Aramaic, so it  seems that 
according to Jewish custom one did not tell parables in Aramaic. To  suggest 
that Jesus told his parables in Aramaic is to ignore overwhelming  evidence 
to the contrary. 
Old ideas die hard, and it appears this also to be the  case concerning the 
languages of Jesus. Why scholars and others continue to  believe Hebrew was 
not Jesus’ mother tongue is another question, but it is not  for lack of 
evidence.

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
  • [RC] Wh... BILROJ via Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community
    • RE... Chris Hahn
      • ... Lennart Johansson

Reply via email to