It is too soon to tell, but the fall of Mosul portends such possibilities as: Iranian intervention in Iraq Saudi intervention in Iraq Gas prices raising 25 or 50 cents a gallon in the US A new offensive by Al-Qaeda to assert its power vis-a-vis ISIL (aka ISIS) New successes for Islamic militants in Syria Some kind of strong reaction by Israel that could inspire new attacks against Israel The secession of Kurdistan from Iraq And God know what else. Of course, the Iraqi army may regroup and retake Mosul, but this seems unlikely.
What do we have? A hideous mess. And why? We spent approximately 1.5 Trillion dollars and sacrificed thousands of American lives. Not even that has proven adequate to create a safe and stable democracy in the country. George W Bush still deserves a good deal of the blame, he did not know what in the hell he was doing in the first place and the result was an incoherent policy that led to massive corruption and inefficiency everywhere. But that was a long time ago. Since 2009 the Iraq situation has been "owned" by President Hussein. So long status of forces agreement, so long US presence in Iraq to safeguard against the kind of Islamic insurgency now threatening the entire regime. And why? Because Obama is also an incompetent who has no idea what in hell he is doing. Everyone who voted for their favorite social worker happy now? Or will they find excuses for his blundering and rationalize it all away? This is, be assured, exactly what Obama voters will do because, you see, for them Obama is the new Jesus, the object of devotions, God on Earth. Excuse me while I vomit. My sentiments Billy =================================== The Atlantic The Meaning of Mosul An al-Qaeda splinter group has seized an Iraqi city the size of Philadelphia. What it could signify for the country and the region. _Carl Schreck_ (http://www.theatlantic.com/carl-schreck/) June 11 2014 Militants believed to be associated with the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) seized key buildings in Iraq's northern city of Mosul late on June 9, taking over the provincial capital's headquarters and other administrative buildings after military and police forces abandoned their positions. So what do we know about the group? And what might the attack mean for Iraq? Also referred to as the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), ISIL is an al-Qaeda splinter faction seeking to carve out a caliphate in Sunni-dominated areas of northern Iraq and Syria. The number of members in the group is unclear, though analysts have put it in the thousands. Since late December, ISIL and other Sunni-led militants have controlled parts of Anbar province, including the city of Fallujah and parts of Ramadi. Al-Qaeda disavowed ties with the group in February after months of feuding. Its members are infamous for their brutal tactics, including beheadings, floggings, torture, and demanding strict adherence to their view of Islamic law, which includes bans on smoking and sex out of wedlock. With an estimated population of nearly 2 million, Mosul is Iraq's second-largest city and has a Sunni Arab majority, though the city has residents of many other religious and ethnic groups. "ISIL draws its strength from Iraq's Sunni-Arab community. So there's an obvious reason for doing that," says Kenneth Pollack, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. Mosul's geography is also of significant strategic importance. It is located on the Tigris River, giving it access to water trade routes, and it is also home to pipelines that carry oil into Turkey. The city is also less than 100 miles from Syria, giving the group a potentially strong foothold to control territory on both sides of the border. "What they're looking to do is erase the border. They are looking to set up a unified state within Iraq and Syria," Pollack says. Furthermore, he adds, Mosul has produced a significant number of the Iraqi military's officer corps as well as influential politicians. Michael Knights, an expert on Iraqi security at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, says that ISIL has operated in Mosul "like mafiosi for years, operating in semi-plain sight, controlling all the organized crime rackets, using the city as a fundraising center." "Now they're going for open control. And that is something that no faction in Iraq can ignore anymore," Knights says. The sheer size of the target is a demonstration of ISIL's capabilities, Pollack says. "Fallujah, Ramadi: Those are not insignificant-sized towns, but they're not major cities. Mosul is a major metropolis. It would be like a terrorist group attacking Dallas or Philadelphia. These are very big urban areas that they are now trying to take on, and it indicates a degree of strength that I don't think anyone recognized that they had." Knights says that the ISIL seizure of government buildings in Mosul goes "above and beyond normal chaos in Iraq." "It goes above and beyond losing Fallujah, a place that everyone's quite happy to write off, typically," Knights adds. "This is a place that nobody can write off. It's a critical economic hub in the country." The reports of Iraqi security forces fleeing the ISIL attackers demonstrates the crucial role that morale plays in armed conflicts in the country, Knights says, quoting the Napoleon Bonaparte axiom that "the moral is to the physical as three to one." "In Iraq it's like six to one. So, if you get 400 really determined fighters, they can make a security force of thousands throw down their weapons and uniforms and run away," he explains. Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has asked the parliament to declare a state of emergency, and Iraqi media reported that lawmakers would meet on June 12 to consider the appeal. On June 9, the governor of Iraq's northern Nineveh province, Athil al-Nujaifi, delivered a televised address asking Mosul residents to fight the militants. Meanwhile, the governor's brother, parliament speaker Osama al-Nujaifi, asked Iraq's government and Kurdistan's regional administration to deploy forces to Mosul. He also said that he also reached out to U.S. Ambassador Robert Beecroft to request assistance. Knights says that it was not unusual for Iraqi security forces to flee an initial assault and then regroup. "They collapse at the start of a fight, they get up, they dust themselves off, and they go back," he adds. "And then, without the element of surprise against them, they do okay. And that's probably what we're going to see next." -- -- Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
