The Week
 
 
The mystery behind China's 
aggressive push into space 
China's 'Tiangong' space lab keeps us  guessing 
 
By Steve Weintz, War is  Boring | July 29, 2014 


 
 

 
Months after its scheduled re-entry into Earth's  atmosphere — and a 
surprise cameo appearance in hit space flick Gravity — China's first space 
station 
boosted into a higher orbit. It still speeds  around the planet, doing … 
what, exactly? 
No one outside of China's popular but opaque space  program seems to know. 
Tiangong, or "heavenly palace," blasted off  atop a Long March 2F booster 
in 2011. "Chinese Gen. Chang Wanquan, commander of  China's manned space 
program, declared the launch a success from a control  center in Beijing, 
drawing applause from assembled Chinese politicians and  
dignitaries,"_Spaceflight 
Now reported_ (http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n1109/29tiangonglaunch/) . 
During spaceflights Shenzhou 9 and  Shenzhou 10, three-person Chinese crews 
lived aboard  Tiangong's small habitat for as long as 15 days at a  
stretch. 
The astronauts practiced rendezvousing and docking  with the station, 
observed the Earth, conducted medical experiments, and tested  equipment. 
Astronaut Wang Yaping _wowed students back home_ 
(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/20/astronauts-china-space-station-video-photos_n_3471804.html)
  with 
her live-cast zero-G  science demos. The manned missions delivered NASA-style 
civil prestige and  outreach. 
All Chinese astronauts are members of the armed  forces. Two-time astronaut 
Nie Haisheng _received his  promotion to general_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shenzhou_10)  just prior to a Tiangong flight 
last  year. The Chinese 
military provides much of the infrastructure and training for  the civil 
manned space program. This is nothing unusual, as the histories of the  
American 
and Soviet space programs prove. 
But China goes it alone in orbit in part because the  country makes other 
spacefaring nations nervous. Beijing wasn't invited to the  International 
Space Station partly because Washington worried the Chinese might  steal 
American technology. And like other space powers, China actively seeks  
military 
advantage in space. 
_The bus-sized _ 
(http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/infocus/china070913/c03_29032438.jpg) 
_Tiangong_ 
(http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/infocus/china070913/c03_29032438.jpg)  
consists of two modules together  providing 
astronauts with around 15 cubic meters of pressurized space. Pretty  crowded 
for 
three people for two weeks, but lots of space for gear if you're  just dropping 
in every now and then. 
Even without a crew, a small space station is a big  bird with plenty of 
power and room. Tiangong would make a great orbital  target for 
rendezvous-and-dock tests of _China's forthcoming cargo spacecraft_ 
(http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/The_Next_Tiangong_999.html) . 
Or it could be doing other things. As with _the U.S.  Air Force's X-37B 
robot space plan_ (https://medium.com/war-is-boring/f688546520d) e, mystery 
opens the door to  daydream. 
That's no moon 
Like its companion Shenzhou — "heavenly  vessel" — spacecraft, 
Tiangongreflects its Soviet design heritage.  Compare the layout of Tiangong to 
the 
Soviet space stations and the  resemblance is clear. 
The USSR seized the lead in space-station operations  during the Cold War, 
and Russia maintains that advantage to this day. From _the  first Salyut 
space stations_ (http://www.astronautix.com/project/salyut.htm)  through the 
Mir station  to the ISS, the USSR and Russia have advanced the art of 
long-term orbital  presence. 
ISS crews get to and from their space base aboard  Soyuz spaceships very 
like their Shenzhou nephews. The  station's "base block" core module is based 
an old Soviet space-station  part. 
During the 1960s, the U.S. Air Force spent several  years and several 
billions of dollars pursuing _a military space station_ 
(http://www.warisboring.com/2010/09/19/i-dream-of-manned-orbiting-laboratory/) 
. Had the government 
not  cancelled the project, so-called Manned Orbiting Laboratories and their 
two-man  crews would have shot into orbit aboard beefed-up Titan missiles 
for month-long  surveillance missions. 
After the 1969 cancellation, the Keyhole series of  spy satellites adopted 
MOL's eyes-in-the-sky mission and its huge  imaging systems. Drone space 
stations, if you will. 
Meanwhile, as their own nation's moonshot faltered,  the Soviet leadership 
decided to accelerate space-station efforts. Several  military stations flew 
under cover of the civil Salyut  program. 
One mission — _Salyut  3, in orbit from June 1974 to January 1975_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salyut_3)  — successfully hosted  one crew and 
test-drove giant spy scopes and even a space cannon. 
Like the Americans, the Soviets found greater success  adapting these big 
man-rated modules into unmanned platforms. Between 1987 and  1992, _two drone 
Almaz stations_ (http://www.russianspaceweb.com/almazt.html)  fitted with 
large  side-looking radars gave the USSR a last, clear look from up high. 
In the years since the Cold War, the Hubble Space  Telescope and ISS have 
taught us the value of "man-tended" spacecraft. The power  of modern IT and 
sensor technologies could exponentially boost the value and  capabilities of 
a large orbiting platform, whether or not a human crew ever  returns. 
The Chinese really get space and its power. _They're putting a lot of 
effort and hardware up there_ 
(http://www.andrewerickson.com/2011/03/craig-covault-aerospace-america-“china’s-military-space-surge”/)
 .  Big sats and little 
sats and bus-sized human-habitable sats. 
What are they doing up there? Only they know for  sure. But it's obvious 
that Tiangong could be more than a scientific  habitat

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to