It cannot be denied that there are major problems of intellect on the  Right
The shallowness and vacuity of once-upon-a-time political celebrities  like
Christine O'Donnell and Todd Akin  -among others-  should leave  no doubt.
The problem extends to the highest levels of the Republican Party as  
various
of its leaders  -think John McCain and Mitt Romney-  demonstrate  on 
a good number of issues that they are ill-informed and simply don't  know
what they are talking about.
 
HOWEVER, all of this conceded, along comes a card carrying Democrat
like Ben Affleck to say to all of us, loud and  clear:   "Hey!   Democrats 
can be
just as stupid, ignorant, and uninformed as any Republican you can think  
of."
 
I have no idea if anyone here saw the HBO show Real Time but I did,  or 
at least as much as I could stand. Bill Maher's fire-and-brimstone  Atheism
is such a turn off for me that I have trouble listening to him for even 5  
minutes
and not even the presence of Sam Harris with his humanistic and  scholarly
version of Atheism was much of a help. Then there was Affleck,  clearly
a man without a brain, or certainly a man incapable of even elementary  
critical
thought. Basically he was an embarrassment to one and all, or so I  thought.
He is utterly clueless about  Islam and has studied none of it, ever,  all 
of his
talking points consisting of regurgitated Leftist claptrap. But even  when
someone is a scholar and also is a Leftist, facts may not register
 
Who came to Affleck's defense  -a defense of an airhead for all  practical 
purposes-
but Juan Cole. This is simply amazing, Cole is, after all, a world class  
scholar of
Islam even though his policy recommendations are mostly (90%) wrong.
Affleck is hopelessly uninformed and operates on the basis of supposition 
and yet Cole let this  pass???
 
Anyway, Rich Lowry's essay is quite good.
 
 
Billy
 
 
==================================
 
 

Ben Affleck's Islam Problem
By _Rich Lowry_ (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/authors/rich_lowry/)  - 
October 8,  2014
_www.realclearpolitics.com_ (http://www.realclearpolitics.com) 
 
The latest episode of Bill Maher’s HBO show Real Time performed what was, 
in  effect, an in-studio social experiment. 
It sought to establish, in a controlled setting, the answer to this 
pressing  question: How long could Maher and atheist author Sam Harris talk 
frankly 
about  the illiberalism of much of the Muslim world before actor and 
director Ben  Affleck, also a guest on the show, accused them of racism?

The result  is in: not very. 
 
In fact, almost as soon as Maher and Harris began to discuss how liberals 
are  betraying their own convictions if they don’t stand up against social  
backwardness in the Muslim world, Affleck grew visibly agitated. He could 
barely  contain himself when Harris opined, “We have been sold this meme of  
Islamophobia, where every criticism of the doctrine of Islam gets conflated 
with  bigotry toward Muslims as people.” 
That’s when Affleck interrupted, and soon enough, he was calling Maher  and 
Harris out for their grossness, ugliness, and, yes, racism. How does it  
feel, guys?

You might be wondering, “Why should I care what  the new Batman thinks?” 
The heated exchange was so notable because all three are  men of the Left in 
good standing. As a walking embodiment of liberal piety,  Affleck is 
emblematic of the movement’s see-no-evil discomfort with frank truths  about 
the 
Muslim world.
 
The prelude to the intra-liberal fight was the prior week’s show, when 
Maher  pointed out the absurdity of liberals’ getting exercised over, say, 
actor 
Jonah  Hill’s using an anti-gay vulgarism, but ignoring that gays can be 
stoned in  Muslim countries. “To count yourself as a liberal,” Maher 
declared, “you have to  stand up for liberal principles” — meaning across the 
board. 
Maher had zeroed in on one of the more perverse aspects of contemporary  
politics, which is that self-consciously tolerant liberals often look the 
other  way when confronted with the intolerance of the Muslim world. 
For them, saying discouraging things about Islam feels too judgmental. It  
requires insisting on the superiority of certain Western standards. It means 
 jettisoning the comforting fictions of multiculturalism. It entails 
resisting  the reflex to consider any criticism of the Third World as 
presumptive  
racism. 
As militant atheists, Maher and Harris feel free of these constraints;  
criticizing religion is part of what they do for a living. As a garden-variety  
liberal, Affleck is subject to all of them and reacted as if two Klansmen 
had  wandered onto the set with him. 
When Maher and Harris pointed out how widespread retrograde attitudes are 
in  the Muslim world, Affleck said they were “stereotyping.” But the data 
doesn’t  stereotype. Especially in less-developed countries, it is appalling. 
The percentage of Muslims in Middle Eastern and South Asian countries who 
say  that honor killings are never justified is shockingly low (31 percent in 
Egypt,  45 percent in Pakistan). Support for the stoning of adulterers is 
more than 40  percent in Bangladesh and 80 percent in Afghanistan. The death 
penalty for  leaving Islam is almost, although not quite, as popular as 
stoning. 
Affleck simply couldn’t handle the truth. He kept on insisting it is just a 
 few bad apples who think this way. At one point, he tried to wave Maher 
and  Harris off with a condemnation of the Iraq War, positing an implicit 
moral  equivalence between an overly idealistic war of liberation and the 
stoning of  apostates. 
Affleck obviously isn’t a public official or a public intellectual. But he  
represents a dominant tendency within liberalism. Imagine a State 
Department  staffed by less-glamorous Ben Afflecks. Imagine a president of the 
United 
States  who shares his instincts. This is the Obama administration. It’s 
why, in part,  it has always been so reluctant to speak of Islamic terrorism 
and extremism.  It’s why the president says the Islamic State is not Islamic. 
The nation is truly in peril if Bill Maher, of all people, is more  
clear-eyed than those running our  government. 


-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to