Real Clear Politics

Real Clear Science
 
Newton Blog
 
 
How to Make Scientists Publish the Truth
Posted by _Alex B.  Berezow_ 
(http://www.realclearscience.com/authors/alex_b_berezow/)  October 21, 2014

John Ioannidis is (in)famous in the scientific community. Using  
straightforward logic and statistics, he convincingly demonstrated that _most  
published research articles are wrong_ 
(http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124) . 
This is not because scientists are  liars 
and crooks, but because studies often do not have large enough sample  sizes 
or are testing unlikely hypotheses. Ioannidis's revelation sent a shock  
wave through the biomedical community. Partially in response to his findings,  
biomedical scientists began to embrace reforms in scientific publishing, 
such as  using more open access journals and publishing replications and 
negative  data. 
Now, in a new paper in PLoS Medicine, Dr. Ioannidis proposes  additional 
reforms. Some of the more interesting ones include:

 
Registration of studies. Clinical trials already do this.  (See 
_ClinicalTrials.gov_ (http://clinicaltrials.gov/) .) This would  allow 
researchers to 
monitor ongoing studies. Others have proposed that _all  registered studies 
should be accepted for publication upon their completion_ 
(http://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2013/jun/05/trust-in-science-study-pre-registration)
 , 
 regardless of the outcome of the experiment. This would eliminate 
"publication  bias," the phenomenon in which only "sexy" results are published 
and 
negative  (or uninteresting) results are ignored. 
Adoption of better statistical methods. It is not a big  secret that 
_biologists  are bad at math_ 
(http://www.realclearscience.com/articles/2012/09/11/biologists_have_a_serious_math_problem_106369.html)
 . (Well, except for 
John Ioannidis.) Papers with a lot of  mathematical equations are _avoided  by 
biologists_ 
(http://blogs.sciencemag.org/sciencecareers/2012/06/too-many-equati.html) . The 
heavy mathematical lifting required in some biomedical  
fields, such as epidemiology and genomics, is outsourced to biostatisticans. 
Dr. 
 Ioannidis suggests more stringent thresholds for statistical significance. 
That  is certainly necessary, but there also should be a requirement for 
all  biomedical PhD students to take courses in biostatistics. 
Improvements in peer review. Though Dr. Ioannidis does not  offer specific 
details, one group is strongly advocating post-publication peer  review. 
_F1000Research_ 
(http://www.realclearscience.com/articles/2014/09/04/f1000_will_make_science_faster_and_transparent_108822.html)
   publishes papers along 
with their expert reviews, which are not allowed to be  anonymous. 
Consideration of stakeholder interests and modification of  incentives. 
Members of the scientific community place different values  on research. For 
example, professors want research that is publishable, while  industry wants 
research that is profitable. Dr. Ioannidis identifies four  interests that 
need to be considered: publishability, fundability,  translatability, and 
profitability. Furthermore, he proposes a radical change in  incentives, such 
as 
eliminating _academic  ranks_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_ranks_(United_States))  (e.g., tenure). 
Scientific publications are on the cusp of a dramatic shift. Thanks to the  
efforts of Dr. Ioannidis and others like him, the monolithic biomedical  
establishment is beginning to embrace change. If only the rest of academia was 
 so reflective and self-critical. 
--- 
_Source_ 
(http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001747) :  
Ioannidis JPA (2014). "How to Make More Published Research 
True." PLoS  Med 11(10): e1001747.  doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001747

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
  • [RC] Ho... BILROJ via Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community
    • Re... Dr. Ernie Prabhakar

Reply via email to