CITY  Journal
 
 
Heather Mac Donald
Infected by Politics
The public-health profession is more  committed to social justice than to 
sound science.
21 October 2014

 
 
The public-health establishment has unanimously opposed a travel and visa  
moratorium from Ebola-plagued West African countries to protect the U.S.  
population. To evaluate whether this opposition rests on purely scientific  
grounds, it helps to understand the political character of the public-health  
field. For the last several decades, the profession has been _awash  in 
social-justice ideology_ 
(http://www.city-journal.org/html/8_4_public_health.html) . Many of its members 
view racism, sexism, and  economic inequality, 
rather than individual behavior, as the primary drivers of  differential health 
outcomes in the U.S. According to mainstream public-health  thinking, 
publicizing the behavioral choices behind bad health—promiscuous sex,  drug 
use, 
overeating, or lack of exercise—blames the victim.  
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s _Healthy Communities 
Program_ 
(http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dch/programs/healthycommunitiesprogram/overview/healthequity.htm)
 , for example, focuses on “unfair  health differences 
closely linked with social, economic or environmental  disadvantages that 
adversely affect groups of people.” CDC’s _Healthy  People 2020_ 
(http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/healthy_people/hp2020.htm)  project recognizes that 
“health 
inequities are tied to  economics, exclusion, and discrimination that prevent 
groups from accessing  resources to live healthy lives,” according to Harvard 
public-health professor  _Nancy Krieger_ 
(http://harvardpublichealthreview.org/addressing-social-inequities-to-create-a-more-just-fair-and-equitable-wor
ld/) . Krieger is herself a magnet for federal funding,  which she uses to 
spread the message about America’s unjust treatment of women,  minorities, 
and the poor. To study the genetic components of health is  tantamount to “
scientific racism,” in Krieger’s view, since doing so overlooks  the “impact 
of discrimination” on health. And of course the idea of any genetic  racial 
differences is anathema to Krieger and her left-wing colleagues.  
Local public-health programs are just as committed to “social justice.” 
The  _National Association  of County and City Health Officials_ 
(http://www.naccho.org/topics/justice/)  promoted a seven-part PBS documentary, 
 
_Unnatural Causes: Is  Inequality Making us Sick?_ 
(http://www.unnaturalcauses.org/) 
, to trigger community dialogues about health  equity. NACCHO’s Health 
Equity and Social Justice initiatives seek to “advance  the capacity of local 
health departments to tackle the root causes of health  inequities.”  
During the height of the AIDS epidemic, the public-health profession 
abjured  any focus on abstinence as a means of stopping the spread of the 
disease. 
This  silence was contrary to decades of public-health response to venereal 
disease,  which stressed individual responsibility, as well as contact 
tracing, to prevent  further infections.  
The American Journal of Public Health recently published a study  
coauthored by Columbia University professor and longtime police critic Jeffrey  
Fagan 
arguing that young black men who have been stopped and questioned by the  
New York Police Department suffer from stress and anxiety. The more times an  
individual gets stopped, Fagan claims, the more stress he may feel. The 
study  did not consider whether individuals who have been stopped numerous 
times by the  police may be anxious because they are gang members operating in 
a 
world where  retaliatory shootings are common. Nor did it compare the 
stress of stop subjects  with the stress once experienced by law-abiding 
residents of high-crime  neighborhoods before the NYPD brought violent crime 
down 80 
percent.  
The public-health profession has a clear political orientation, so it’s 
quite  possible that its opposition to a visa and travel moratorium is 
influenced as  much by belief in America’s responsibility for the postcolonial 
oppression of  Africa, and suspicion of American border enforcement, as it is 
by 
a commitment  to public-health principles of containment and control. 
(African countries,  unburdened by any such racial guilt, have not hesitated to 
impose travel bans;  Nigeria’s travel restrictions are now being credited for 
its escape from an  Ebola incursion.) To be sure, the logistics of such a 
moratorium would be  challenging, but no more challenging than retrofitting 
American hospitals for  Ebola patients. 

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to