Informed Comment
 
_Is ISIL’s Ideology really Grounded in Saudi Textbooks?_ 
(http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/juancole/ymbn/~3/AvF2pv0p65U/ideology-grounded-textbooks.html?u
tm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email)   
Posted:  31 Oct 2014 09:48 PM PDT 
 
By Emile Nakhleh 
WASHINGTON (IPS) – According to an article published Oct. 21 on Al-Monitor, 
 the Islamic State (ISIS or IS) has issued new regulations for the school 
systems  under its control in Iraq and Syria. The announced purpose of the 
so-called  guidelines, which carried the imprimatur of the group’s “Amir al-Mu
’minin,”  presumably leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, is to “eradicate 
ignorance and  disseminate Sharia sciences.” 
Although the “guidelines” are extreme, controlling and regressive, some of 
 the key elements in the IS educational programme are similar to what one 
finds  in Saudi textbooks, especially those that are taught in Saudi public 
middle and  high schools. The ideological foundations of Saudi public school 
education are  based on Wahhabi-Salafi-Hanbali theology.
Science experiments are allowed  with the understanding that the doctrine 
of “Tawheed” or “Oneness” of God  permeates the universe. God created 
everything and every creature. There is no  “Big Bang” theory and no evolution 
of the human, animal, or plant species. 
One key difference focuses on the nation-state. Whereas Saudi education  
accepts the Saudi and other Arab and Muslim states, with recognised boundaries 
 and national ethos, IS rejects national boundaries within Dar al-Islam, or 
the  Abode of Islam, and individual states. Instead, it calls for one 
Islamic State  or a “Caliphate.” 
The new guidelines call on teachers to emphasise creationism, reject  
Darwinism, eliminate music and the arts, teach history from a Sunni-Islamic  
perspective, discard modernity, and of course segregate the sexes. 
Saudi textbooks 
Much of IS’s educational “curriculum” finds its roots in Saudi textbooks,  
especially at the middle school and high school levels. Arabic, literature, 
 history, civic education, cultural values, and norms of behaviour—whether 
in a  home or societal setting—are all taught according to a particular 
interpretation  of Sunni Islam. 
The Wahhabi-Salafi-Hanbali interpretation also permeates religion or 
theology  classes, especially those that focus on elements of Sharia, fiqh  
(jurisprudence), or the Hadith. The biological and physical sciences are taught 
 
from a pre-ordained creationist perspective, which rejects modernity in 
favour  of traditionalism. 
Science experiments are allowed with the understanding that the doctrine of 
 “Tawheed” or “Oneness” of God permeates the universe. God created 
everything and  every creature. There is no “Big Bang” theory and no evolution 
of 
the human,  animal, or plant species. 
Even the geography curriculum discusses the region from an Islamic  
perspective. For example, kids are taught that the “Zionists” have occupied  
Palestine illegally, and the Islamic umma one day must re-establish Muslim  
control over Jerusalem, the “Third Qibla” of Islam, to which Muslims turn to  
pray after Mecca and Medina. “Israel,” for example, does not appear on maps 
of  the Arab world in Saudi geography textbooks. 
The Saudi curriculum, much like what IS is urging Syrians and Iraqis under  
its control to teach and preach, imparts to the youth a narrow-minded,  
conservative, traditional worldview. It is intolerant of other religions and  
even of other sects in Islam. 
Oftentimes, Shia Muslims are considered “apostates,” or “rejectionists,” 
and  could be subject to discrimination and even death. The Shia in Saudi 
Arabia and  Bahrain are excluded from key government, defence, and national 
security  positions. 
The Saudi youth are socialised in public schools on the importance of Islam 
 in the personal, familial, social, and national levels. Whenever Islam, as 
a  faith and a territory, is threatened or invaded, Muslims have a duty to 
do jihad  against the perceived “enemies” of Islam. 
Saudi education espouses this ideology, so do al-Qaeda and IS. In the past  
three decades, Muslim youth have participated in large numbers in jihad 
across  the Muslim world, from Afghanistan to Chechnya, and from the Balkans to 
Iraq and  Syria. 
The Saudi government participates in the anti-IS coalition, yet IS’s 
jihadist  ideology resonates with Saudi educated youth. Their government talks 
about a  possible peace with Israel should it withdraw to the 1967 borders, yet 
Saudi  youth do not see Israel on the maps in their textbooks. 
If the Saudi youth are taught about the duty of jihad in the face of a “war 
 on Islam,” as Bin Ladin had preached for years, and view IS rightly or 
wrongly  as the “defender” of Islam, they can’t understand why their 
government is  fighting on the side of Islam’s “enemies.” 
This is particularly poignant, especially since some Saudi clerics have  
strongly endorsed the type of educational curriculum that is currently being  
pushed by IS in Iraq and Syria. 
Textbooks play a central role in educating and socialising Saudi youth and  
many of their teachers. Many Saudi grade school teachers do not have a 
college  degree and rely on the textbook to guide them through the course. 
Those 
who are  college graduates usually receive their degrees from teachers’ 
colleges, which  teach a curriculum heavily imbued with Islamic studies and 
Arabic language,  grammar, and literature. 
The ministries of education and religious affairs, which are heavily 
staffed  by Salafi Islamists, approve the curriculums and have the final say on 
what’s  taught in schools. 
Teachers are not allowed to stray away from the textbook or offer analytic  
judgments or opinions either on the material in the text or current issues 
that  might relate to the subject under discussion. Both teaching and 
learning are  done almost by rote memory. No critical thinking is allowed and 
no 
logical  extrapolation is encouraged. 
Teachers and students accept whatever interpretations are offered in the  
textbooks, especially if such an interpretation is attributed to the Koran, 
the  Hadith, or Sharia. Such attributions and religious quotations permeate 
the  textbooks regardless of the subject matter. 
Policy implications 
So what if the educational curriculum of IS tracks with Saudi education?  
Should the U.S. and other countries do anything about it, and can they? 
Several years back, I briefed senior policymakers in the United States and  
other countries on the Saudi curriculum, the jihadist message it transmits 
to  youth, and the radicalisation that was sure to follow. It was “actionable
”  intelligence in that Western diplomats could speak to Saudi leaders 
about a very  specific problem, which they could address. 
According to media reports, Saudi officials were amenable to review their  
textbooks with an eye toward softening the Islamist message. Unfortunately, 
not  much was done. 
Saudi clerics objected to any revisions of the textbooks on the grounds 
that  non-Muslim outsiders were interfering with religious teachings in the 
kingdom.  Some of them went even further to depict suggestions along these 
lines as a  “conspiracy” against Islam. Western diplomats, who had pushed the 
issue, backed  off. 
Other interests in recent years—including Iran, Iraq, the aftermath of the  
Arab Spring, counterterrorism, commerce, oil, arming anti-Assad jihadists, 
and  more recently, building a coalition against IS—have in all candor 
trumped  Western interests in “reforming” Saudi textbooks. 
I argued in previous articles that although IS is defeatable and 
containable,  the ideological root causes must be dealt with. Otherwise, other 
Islamist  terrorist organisations would rise on the ashes of IS. 
The latest educational “guidelines” issued by the Islamic State are a 
stark  example of what’s wrong with our strategic policy planning on the root 
causes of  terrorism. Discussing Saudi textbooks is the first step toward “
degrading and  defeating” IS. 
Emile Nakhleh is a Research Professor at the University of New Mexico, a  
member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and author of “A Necessary  
Engagement: Reinventing America’s Relations with the Muslim  World.”

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to