Did Ayers Help Obama Get Into  Harvard? 

 
 
Jack Cashill  
_AmericanThinker.com_ 
(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/09/did_ayers_help_obama_get_into.html) 
September 20, 2009 
Although terrorist emeritus Bill Ayers claims not to have met  Barack Obama 
until the mid-1990s, there is reason to believe that he not only  knew 
Obama much earlier, but that he helped get him into Harvard Law School.  
The evidence, substantial if speculative, can be found in an  unlikely 
source, Barack Obama's 2006 bestseller, Audacity of Hope , and  it may have 
been 
provided by Ayers himself.  
In the way of background, I have made the _argument_ 
(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/who_wrote_dreams_and_why_it_ma_1.html)  
on these pages 
that Bill Ayers wrote the  better part of Obama's acclaimed 1995 memoir, Dreams 
>From My  Father.  
>From the beginning of my research, I had focused on Dreams because the myth 
of Obama's genius is built squarely upon this first  book.  So well crafted 
is Dreams that it inspired British author  Jonathan Raban to annoint Obama 
"the best writer to occupy the White _House_ 
(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/09/did_ayers_help_obama_get_into.html)  
since Lincoln," and his is the 
consensus  opinion among the world's literati.  
Audacity has not gotten the rave reviews  Dreams has.  The New York Times 
accurately describes it  "as much more of a political document."  The Times 
adds that  "portions of the volume read like outtakes from a stump speech." 
With good  cause.  As I have _shown_ 
(http://www.cashill.com/intellect_fraud/who_wrote_audacity.htm)  previously, 
portions of Audacity are, in  fact, 
word-for-word outtakes from stump speeches, most likely written by Obama  
speechwriter Jon Favreau.   
Still, the Times reassures its readers that "enough of  the narrative voice 
in [ Audacity ] is recognizably similar to the one  in Dreams From My 
Father ."  With a major assist from a scholar  who prefers to remain anonymous, 
whom I call "Mr. West," I have become  increasingly convinced that Ayers 
wrote those stretches of Audacity  that best capture Dreams' narrative voice, 
including the book's nicely  written epilogue.  
What attracted Mr. West to the epilogue was a series of  parallel word 
choices as well as a positive reference to Benjamin Franklin, a  figure whom 
Ayers also speaks of approvingly.  After a close review of my  own, I am 
convinced that the epilogue, especially its last thousand words, shows  the 
hand 
of Ayers as clearly as any passage in Dreams.    Intriguingly, too, Ayers may 
have written himself into its dialogue.  
Although no one word or phrase reaches smoking gun status, I  was able to 
match every distinctive phrase and concept from this thousand-word  stretch 
of Audacity to a comparable one from Ayers' work-with one  interesting 
exception.  And for reference I was only using two of Ayers'  books--his 2001 
memoir Fugitive Days and a 2004 collection called  Teaching the Personal and 
the 
Political: Essays on Hope and Justice.  This extraordinary parallelism 
suggests a certain haste on Ayers' part as  he seemed to be mining his own 
clichés.  
Many of the words and phrases in the Audacity epilogue  can be found in the 
Ayers' books, often multiple times.  These include  words like 
"contingent," "obscurity," "torrent," "inherently," "satisfying,"  glimpse," 
"fleeting," 
"demonstrable," "calculation," "petty," "nameless,"  "faceless," as well as 
"narrow" and "landscape" used metaphorically, and "labor"  used as a verb.  
Telling too are the phrases: "my heart," "filled with,"   "measure of," 
"sense of," "what matters," "the path to." Again, none of these is  significant 
in itself.  It is just that every phrase I searched in  Audacity I found in 
Ayers, again often multiple times.  This does  not happen by chance.  
The parallel concepts convinced me beyond doubt of Ayers'  involvement.  In 
the epilogue, the voice of Obama tells us that  "satisfaction is not to be 
found in the glare of _television_ 
(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/09/did_ayers_help_obama_get_into.html)  
cameras."  Ayers is equally disdainful  
of "the sinister glare of celebrity."  
Obama talks about our "collective dreams." Ayers uses the word  
"collective" the way others use "and" and "the." The Weather Underground was  
organized 
into "collectives." He refers to "collective well-being," "collective  
gloom," "collective goodwill" and a dozen other Marxist-spawned "collective"  
sentiments.  Speaking of Marx, Obama uses the concept of "process" in a  
consciously dialectic sense as does Ayers.  
In Audacity's epilogue, Obama tells the reader the he  strives "to help 
people live their lives with some measure of dignity."   Ayers too sees the 
need "to validate the dignity and worth of students," to  honor "the full 
measure of their humanity," and to make efforts "to achieve and  extend human 
dignity."  
Obama talks of people "constructing lives for themselves and  their 
children."  Ayers speaks of "our constructed reality" and tells his  readers 
that 
"the details and symbols of your life have been deliberately  constructed" 
and that in his terrorist days, "we constructed our lives  underground."  
In the epilogue's most dramatic moment, Obama relates a  conversation he 
had had nearly twenty years earlier with a friend of his, "an  older man who 
had been active in the civil rights efforts in Chicago in the  sixties."  
This friend was "one of the few academics" that Obama knew, and  Obama listened 
closely to his advice about law school and a political career  beyond.  
"Both law and politics required compromise," the man tells him,  adding 
that he himself had thought about going into politics but was unwilling  to 
compromise.  Historically, the real life Ayers has sounded much like  Obama's 
academic sage.  In Fugitive Days , for instance, he tells  us that he and his 
comrades were eager to "combat the culture of compromise."  
Looking back, Obama concedes that he was "perhaps more tolerant  of 
compromise" than this older friend was.  Curiously, "tolerant" is the  one key 
word 
not found in either of Ayers' books in question.  Apparently,  he has no 
particular use for that concept.  
The evidence to this point suggests that Ayers ghosted the  epilogue of 
Audacity and that his worldview closely parallels the one  attributed to Obama. 
 But there is a corollary question that begs to be  asked: just who is this 
"older man," the "academic" and veteran "civil rights."  activist who wrote 
a recommendation to help Obama get into Harvard Law.  
The epilogue identifies this friend as an urban studies  professor at 
Northwestern University, but if there were such a professor, why  not name him? 
 
What reason would there be to conceal his identity?  
A more likely possibility, of course, is that the "older man"  was Ayers 
himself.  The conversation between Obama and the man is extensive  and 
impressively well remembered.  Since the older man is making points  that Ayers 
himself has made over the years -- especially the need to resist "the  culture 
of compromise"--Ayers would have had no problem recalling and writing  such 
a passage.  
The year of the conversation would have been 1988.  Ayers  and Obama were 
both in Chicago.  Ayers, seventeen years Obama's senior, was  indeed an 
"academic" with a newly minted doctorate of education from Columbia.  
Although Ayers did not teach at Northwestern, his wife,  Bernadine Dohrn, 
has, and Ayers himself presented a paper at Northwestern during  the time of 
Audacity's composition.  Ayers teaches in the  Education Department at the 
University of Illinois, Chicago, but he has taught  at least one course there 
under the rubric, "Education/Urban Studies."  
If the world thinks of Ayers as a terrorist, he likes to think  of himself 
as a civil rights activist.  "Most of us had come to our  understanding of 
the world from our involvement in the civil rights and peace  movements," he 
writes in Fugitive Days .  This is an identity he  has aggressively staked, 
largely to establish the moral high ground in his  endless squabbles with 
other, less seasoned left wing factions.   
Ayers did not complete his doctorate at Columbia until 1987,  but Dohrn 
apparently left New York and began work at the Chicago Law Firm of  Sidley 
Austin in 1984.  Ayers seems to have commuted between his wife and  children in 
Chicago and his university in New York from 1984 to 1987.   Obama left New 
York, where he too had attended Columbia University, and arrived  in Chicago 
in 1985. 
Steve Diamond, a life long member of the democratic left  writing on his 
blog, Global Labor (now part of his new blog King  Harvest) has documented 
that Ayers and Obama had a relationship dating back  to their work together on 
a major 1988 educational reform project in Chicago.  Diamond’s source was “
a senior Democratic Party activist who was part of the  Obama campaign.”  
Although CEO of a major power company, Commonwealth Edison,  Bill Ayers’s 
father, Tom, apparently worked on this same project. Tom Ayers had  been a 
major client of Sidley Austin, and it has been acknowledged by at least  one 
senior partner that Ayers got Dohrn her job. Given her contempt conviction  
for refusing to cooperate in a terrorist investigation, Dohrn would have 
needed  some extraordinary pull to get hired by a prestigious law firm. She 
could not be  admitted to the bar. A few years later, Sidley Austin hired Obama 
on as a summer  intern. Did Tom Ayers grease those skids as well?   
In the educational world, if not in the legal one, the radical  past of 
Ayers and Dohrn made them rock stars.  An endorsement from Ayers  would have 
carried real weight at Harvard.  If he did help Obama get in, it  would have 
made perfect sense for Ayers to guide his protégé through, to get him  the 
gig at Sidley Austin, to help him write Dreams , to secure him the  chair of 
the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (also confirmed by Diamond), and to  launch 
his campaign for the Illinois State Senate with a fundraiser chez Ayers.  
Ayers surely saw the potential.  He was the wordsmith  Cyrano to Obama's 
winsome Christian.  Although a political person like  Audacity's "older man," 
Ayers could never hope to woo fair America on  his own.  
Given Obama's oddly impolitic lurch to the left, David Horowitz  has come 
to think of him as the "Manchurian Candidate."  The usually  prudent Horowitz 
wonders out loud who has been whispering in Obama's ear and for  how long.  
 
With his fingerprints on the 2006 Audacity of Hope ,  the 1995 Dreams From 
My Father , and quite possibly on the 1988 Harvard  letter of 
recommendation, Professor Ayers has to be a suspect. 

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to