Critics pounce after Obama talks Crusades, slavery at prayer  breakfast
Juliet Eilperin ("The Washington Post," February 5, 2015) 
President Obama has never been one to go easy on America. 
As a new president, he dismissed the idea of American exceptionalism, 
noting  that Greeks think their country is special, too. He labeled the 
Bush-era  
interrogation practices, euphemistically called “harsh” for years, as 
torture.  America, he has suggested, has much to answer given its history in 
Latin America  and the Middle East. 
His latest challenge came Thursday at the National Prayer Breakfast. At a  
time of global anxiety over Islamist terrorism, Obama noted pointedly that 
his  fellow Christians, who make up a vast majority of Americans, should 
perhaps not  be the ones who cast the first stone. 
“Humanity has been grappling with these questions throughout human history,”
  he told the group, speaking of the tension between the compassionate and  
murderous acts religion can inspire. “And lest we get on our high horse and 
 think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the 
Crusades and  the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of 
Christ. In our  home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified 
in 
the name of  Christ.” 
Some Republicans were outraged. “The president’s comments this morning at 
the  prayer breakfast are the most offensive I’ve ever heard a president 
make in my  lifetime,” said former Virginia governor Jim Gilmore (R). “He has 
offended every  believing Christian in the United States. This goes further 
to the point that  Mr. Obama does not believe in America or the values we 
all share.” 
Obama’s remarks spoke to his unsparing, sometimes controversial, view of 
the  United States — where triumphalism is often overshadowed by a harsh 
assessment  of where Americans must try harder to live up to their own 
self-image. Only by  admitting these shortcomings, he has argued, can we fix 
problems 
and move beyond  them. 
“There is a tendency in us, a sinful tendency, that can pervert and distort 
 our faith,” he said at the breakfast. 
But many critics believe that the president needs to focus more on enemies 
of  the United States. 
Russell Moore, president of the Southern Baptist Ethics and Religious 
Liberty  Commission, called Obama’s comments about Christianity “an unfortunate 
attempt  at a wrongheaded moral comparison.” 
What we need more is a “moral framework from the administration and a clear 
 strategy for defeating ISIS,” he said, using an acronym for the Islamic  
State. 
Obama spoke a day after meeting with Muslim leaders, in what participants  
said was his first roundtable with a Muslim-only group since taking office. 
The  Muslim leaders who argued that they feel their community has faced 
unfair  scrutiny in the wake of terrorist attacks overseas. Although the White 
House  released only a broad description of the meeting — which touched on 
issues  including racial profiling — participants said it gave them a chance 
to express  their concerns directly to the president. 
Farhana Khera, executive director of the civil rights group Muslim 
Advocates,  one of 13 participants, said the session gave Obama a chance to 
focus on 
Muslim  Americans the way he has done with other constituencies, such as 
African  American and Jewish groups. 
“I started off by saying the biggest concern I hear from Muslim parents is  
their fear that their children will be ashamed to be Muslim” because of  
discrimination, Khera said. “We are asking him to use his bully pulpit to have 
a  White House summit on hate crimes against religious minorities, much 
like the  summit on bullying reset the conversation around LGBT youth.” 
Obama emphasized the need to respect minorities in his speech Thursday,  
saying it was part of the obligation Americans face as members of a diverse 
and  open society, “And if, in fact, we defend the legal right of a person to 
insult  another’s religion, we’re equally obligated to use our free speech 
to condemn  such insults — and stand shoulder to shoulder with religious 
communities,  particularly religious minorities who are the targets of such 
attacks.” 
For the president, the prayer breakfast represented a role he has played  
before: explaining to Americans why others might see things differently. 
Joshua  DuBois, who headed the White House Office of Faith Based and 
Neighborhood  Partnerships under Obama and has served as an informal spiritual 
adviser, 
said  the president is conscious of the fact that Islam is an abstraction 
for much of  the general public. 
“The president, as a Christian, knows many American Muslims,” DuBois said. 
 “Unfortunately, a lot of folks in our country don’t have close 
relationships  with Muslims. The only time they’re hearing about Islam is in 
the 
context of the  foreign policy crisis or what’s happening with ISIS.” 
As a result, many Americans have an increasingly hostile view of Islam. A 
Pew  Research Center survey last fall found that half of Americans think the 
Islamic  religion is more likely than others to encourage violence, while 39 
percent said  it does not. The view that Islam is more apt to encourage 
violent acts rose 12  percentage points from the beginning of 2014 and was 
double the number who said  so in March 2002 — less than a year after the Sept. 
11 attacks. 
In the past, Obama has used stark, personal terms to describe ongoing  
tensions between African Americans and America’s white majority. When 
discussing 
 the acquittal of George Zimmerman in the February 2012 shooting of Trayvon 
 Martin, a black teenager, he spoke of being trailed while shopping in a  
department store and hearing the locks on cars click as he walked down the  
street. 
But he has also framed the most incendiary aspects of race relations —  
whether it’s the moment when his former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright,  
thundered “God damn America” from the pulpit or the shooting of another 
unarmed  young black man, Michael Brown — as an opportunity to test the concept 
of  American exceptionalism. 
He titled the 2008 speech he delivered in Philadelphia about Wright “A More 
 Perfect Union,” a phrase he echoed 6 1 /2 years later when he addressed 
the  United Nations General Assembly. 
“We welcome the scrutiny of the world — because what you see in America is 
a  country that has steadily worked to address our problems and make our 
union more  perfect,” Obama said. “America is not the same as it was 100 
years ago, 50 years  ago or even a decade ago. Because we fight for our ideals 
and are willing to  criticize ourselves when we fall short.” 
But each of these admissions of fault — whether it is Obama’s 
acknowledgment  during his 2009 Cairo speech that the United States was 
involved in the 
1953  coup overthrowing the government of Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad 
Mossadegh or  the suggestion that America has “a moral responsibility to act” 
on arms control  because only the United States had “used a nuclear weapon”
 — has drawn sharp  criticism from opponents. 
Obama has argued that United States is exceptional because it responds to 
its  citizens’ frank assessments of whether it lives up to its core values. 
And he  has defended the exceptional role it plays in the world given its 
military power  and political traditions, like when Obama decided to intervene 
in Libya on the  grounds that it is not in America’s nature to stand by 
while a civilian  population is threatened. 
But he has always argued that straying from those values, as he believes  
happened during the George W. Bush administration, weakens the United States. 
 “We went off course,” he said early in his presidency of the detention 
and  interrogation practices of his predecessor, and he pledged to end 
torture, close  the military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and correct what 
he 
defined as  mistakes America made during the country’s “season of fear.” 
Critics say that Obama is chastising the wrong people. 
“The evil actions that he mentioned were clearly outside the moral pa
rameters  of Christianity itself and were met with overwhelming moral 
opposition 
from  Christians,” Moore said. He added that while he understood Obama’s 
attempt to  make sure “he is not heard as saying that all Muslims are 
terrorists, I think  most people know that at this point.”  
____________________________________

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to