Creative  Thinking 

Some time ago I received a call from a colleague. He  was about to give a 
student a zero for his answer to a physics question, while  the student 
claimed a perfect score. The instructor and the student agreed to an  impartial 
arbiter, and I was selected.I read the examination question: "SHOW HOW  IT IS 
POSSIBLE TO DETERMINE THE HEIGHT OF A TALL BUILDING WITH THE AID OF A  
BAROMETER." The student had answered, "Take the barometer to the top of the  
building, attach a long rope to it, lower it to the street, and then bring it  
up, measuring the length of the rope. The length of the rope is the height 
of  the building." The student really had a strong case for full credit since 
he had  really answered the question completely and correctly! On the other 
hand, if  full credit were given, it could well contribute to a high grade 
in his physics  course and to certify competence in physics, but the answer 
did not confirm  this. I suggested that the student have another try. I gave 
the student six  minutes to answer the question with the warning that the 
answer should show some  knowledge of physics. At the end of five minutes, he 
had not written anything. I  asked if he wished to give up, but he said he 
had many answers to this problem;  he was just thinking of the best one. I 
excused myself for interrupting him and  asked him to please go on. In the 
next minute, he dashed off his answer which  read: "Take the barometer to the 
top of the building and lean over the edge of  the roof. Drop the barometer, 
timing its fall with a stopwatch. Then, using the  formula x=0.5*a*t^^2, 
calculate the height of the building." At this point, I  asked my colleague if 
he would give up. He conceded, and gave the student almost  full credit. 
While leaving my colleague's office, I recalled that the student  had said 
that he had other answers to the problem, so I asked him what they  were. 
"Well," said the student, "there are many ways of getting the height of a  tall 
building with the aid of a barometer. For example, you could take the  
barometer out on a sunny day and measure the height of the barometer, the 
length  
of its shadow, and the length of the shadow of the building, and by the use 
of  simple proportion, determine the height of the building. "Fine," I said, 
"and  others?" "Yes," said the student, "there is a very basic measurement 
method you  will like. In this method, you take the barometer and begin to 
walk up the  stairs. As you climb the stairs, you mark off the length of the 
barometer along  the wall. You then count the number of marks, and this will 
give you the height  of the building in barometer units." "A very direct 
method." "Of course. If you  want a more sophisticated method, you can tie the 
barometer to the end of a  string, swing it as a pendulum, and determine 
the value of g at the street level  and at the top of the building. From the 
difference between the two values of g,  the height of the building, in 
principle, can be calculated." "On this same  tact, you could take the 
barometer 
to the top of the building, attach a long  rope to it, lower it to just 
above the street, and then swing it as a pendulum.  You could then calculate 
the 
height of the building by the period of the  precession". "Finally," he 
concluded, "there are many other ways of solving the  problem. Probably the 
best," he said, "is to take the barometer to the basement  and knock on the 
superintendent's door. When the superintendent answers, you  speak to him as 
follows: 'Mr. Superintendent, here is a fine barometer. If you  will tell me 
the height of the building, I will give you this barometer." At  this point, 
I asked the student if he really did not know the conventional  answer to 
this question. He admitted that he did, but said that he was fed up  with high 
school and college instructors trying to teach him how to  think.

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to