Hi Mike, Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 2, 2015, at 13:39, MG <[email protected]> wrote: > > Responsible innovation" works as an alternative contender. The term works for > us because of both its components and its existence as a unique term. > "Responsibility" calls to a conservatism that demands obligation to the > taxpayer, citizen, and objects under our control. "Innovation" is a > progressive assurance our continued evolution and rejection of rose-tinted > glasses. Together, responsible innovation are two words competing against > each other, demanding both analysts and philosophers constantly in the > driver's seat. In essence, we would be dressing up foxes as hedgehogs and > selling it. So I suggest the goal, so long as the vision works for you also, > is now to get others to embrace the term and build on what it means. Thanks! I was just taking about that with Billy. I am now using a variation "Humane Innovation." A little softer than Responsible, and lets our party be HIP instead of RIP. :). Still work for you? -- -- Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
