Distributism >From Wikipedia
Distributism (also known as distributionism_[1]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-1) or distributivism_[2]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-2) ) is an _economic ideology_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_ideology) that developed in Europe in the late 19th and early 20th century based upon the principles of _Catholic social teaching_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_social_teaching) , especially the teachings of _Pope Leo XIII_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Leo_XIII) in his _encyclical_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclical) _Rerum novarum_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rerum_novarum) and _Pope Pius XI_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Pius_XI) in _Quadragesimo anno_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadragesimo_anno) ._[3]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-3) In the early 21st century, some observers have speculated about _Pope Francis_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Francis) 's exact position on distributism _[4]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-4) _[5]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-5) _[6]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-6) _[7]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-7) _[8]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-8) _[9]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-9) _[10]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-10) because of his denouncement of unfettered capitalism as tyranny in his 84-page apostolic exhortation _Evangelii gaudium_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evangelii_gaudium) : Just as the commandment 'Thou shalt not kill' sets a clear limit in order to safeguard the value of human life, today we also have to say 'thou shalt not' to an economy of exclusion and inequality. Such an economy kills... A new tyranny is thus born, invisible and often virtual, which unilaterally and relentlessly imposes its own laws and rules. To all this we can add widespread corruption and self-serving tax evasion, which has taken on worldwide dimensions. The thirst for power and possessions knows no limits. Overview According to distributists, _property_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_property) ownership is a fundamental right,_[11]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-11) and the _means of production_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Means_of_production) should be spread as widely as possible, rather than being centralized under the control of the state (_state socialism_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_socialism) ), a few individuals (_plutocracy_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutocracy) ), or corporations (_corporatocracy_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatocracy) ). Distributism, therefore, advocates a society marked by widespread property ownership._[12]_ (htt ps://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-12) _Co-operative_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Co-operatives) economist _Race Mathews_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_Mathews) argues that such a system is key to bringing about a just _social order_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_order) ._[13]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-13) Distributism has often been described in opposition to both _socialism_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism) and _capitalism_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism) ,_[14]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-14) _[15]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-15) which distributists see as equally flawed and exploitive._[16]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-Prentiss.2C_Craig_R._200 8_p._77-16) Thomas Storck argues: "both socialism and capitalism are products of the _European Enlightenment_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_Enlightenment) and are thus modernizing and anti-traditional forces. Further, some distributists argue that socialism is the logical conclusion of capitalism as capitalism's concentrated powers eventually capture the state, resulting in a form of socialism._[17]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-17) _[18]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-18) In contrast, distributism seeks to subordinate economic activity to human life as a whole, to our spiritual life, our intellectual life, our family life"._[19]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_ note-19) Some have seen it more as an aspiration, which has been successfully realised in the short term by commitment to the principles of _subsidiarity_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsidiarity) and _solidarity_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_solidarity) (these being built into financially independent local _cooperatives_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooperative) and small _family businesses_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_business) ), though proponents also cite such periods as the _Middle Ages_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_Ages) as examples of the historical long-term viability of distributism._[20]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-20) Particularly influential in the development of distributist theory were _Catholic_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church) authors _G. K. Chesterton_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._K._Chesterton) and _Hilaire Belloc_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilaire_Belloc) ,_[16]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-Prentiss.2C_Craig_R._2008_p._77-16) the _Chesterbelloc_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G.K._Chesterton#The_Chesterbelloc) , two of distributism's earliest and strongest proponents._[21]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-21) _[22]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-Riff.2C_Michael_A._1990_p._35-22) Background The mid-to-late 19th century witnessed the growth of _political Catholicism_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_Catholicism) across _Europe_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Europe) ._[23]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-23) According to historian Michael A. Riff, a common feature of these movements was opposition not only to _secularism_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secularism) , but also to both capitalism and socialism._[22]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-Riff.2C_Michael_A._1990_p._35-22 ) In 1891 _Pope Leo XIII_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Leo_XIII) promulgated _Rerum novarum_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rerum_novarum) , in which he addressed the "misery and wretchedness pressing so unjustly on the majority of the working class" and spoke of how "a small number of very rich men" had been able to "lay upon the teeming masses of the laboring poor a yoke little better than that of slavery itself."._[24]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-24) Affirmed in the encyclical was the right of all men to own property,_[25]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note- 25) the necessity of a system that allowed "as many as possible of the people to become owners",_[26]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-Leo_XIII.2C_Rerum_novarum.2C_49-26) the duty of employers to provide safe _working conditions_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working_conditions) _[27]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-27) and sufficient wages,_[28]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_ note-28) and the right of workers to _unionise_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade_union) ._[26]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-Leo_XIII.2C_Rerum_novarum.2C_49-26) _Common_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_ownership) and _government_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_ownership) property ownership was expressly dismissed as a means of helping the poor._[29]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-29) _[30]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-30) Around the start of the 20th century, _G. K. Chesterton_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._K._Chesterton) and _Hilaire Belloc_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilaire_Belloc) drew together the disparate experiences of the various cooperatives and _friendly societies_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friendly_society) in Northern England, Ireland, and Northern Europe into a coherent political ideology which specifically advocated widespread private ownership of housing and control of industry through owner-operated small businesses and worker-controlled cooperatives. In the United States in the 1930s, distributism was treated in numerous essays by Chesterton, Belloc and others in _The American Review_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_American_Review_(literary_journal)) , published and edited by _Seward Collins_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seward_Collins) . Pivotal among Belloc's and Chesterton's other works regarding distributism include _The Servile State_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Servile_State) ,_[31]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-31) and Outline of Sanity._[32]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-32) Although a majority of distributism's later supporters were not Catholics and many were in fact former _radical_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radicalism_(historical)) socialists who had become disillusioned with socialism, distributist thought was adopted by the _Catholic Worker Movement_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Worker_Movement) , conjoining it with the thought of _Dorothy Day_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorothy_Day) and _Peter Maurin_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Maurin) concerning localized and independent communities. It also influenced the thought behind the _Antigonish Movement_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antigonish_Movement) , which implemented cooperatives and other measures to aid the poor in the Canadian _Maritimes_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maritimes) . Its practical implementation in the form of local cooperatives has recently been documented by _Race Mathews_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_Mathews) in his 1999 book Jobs of Our Own: Building a Stakeholder Society. Position within the political spectrum The position of distributists when compared to other political philosophies is somewhat paradoxical and complicated (see _Triangulation_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangulation_(politics)) ). Strongly entrenched in an _organic_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_(model)) but very _English Catholicism_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_in_England_and_Wales) , advocating culturally traditionalist and _agrarian_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agrarianism) values, directly challenging the precepts of _Whig history_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whig_history) — Belloc was nonetheless an MP for the Liberal Party and Chesterton once stated "As much as I ever did, more than I ever did, I believe in Liberalism. But there was a rosy time of innocence when I believed in Liberals."_[33]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-orthodoxy-3 3) This _liberalism_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism) is different from most modern forms, taking influence from _William Cobbett_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Cobbett) and _John Ruskin_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ruskin) , who combined elements of _radicalism_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radicalism_(historical)) , challenging the establishment position, but from a perspective of renovation, not revolution; seeing themselves as trying to restore the traditional liberties of England and her people which had been taken away from them, amongst other things, since the _Industrial Revolution_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_Revolution) . While converging with certain elements of traditional _Toryism_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toryism) , especially an appreciation of the _Middle Ages_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_Ages) and organic society, there were several points of significant contention. While many Tories were strongly opposed to reform, the distributists in certain cases saw this not as conserving a legitimate traditional concept of England, but in many cases, entrenching harmful errors and innovations. Belloc was quite explicit in his opposition to _Protestantism_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protestantism) as a concept and _schism_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schism_(religion)) from the Catholic Church in general, considering the division of _Christendom_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christendom) in the 16th century one of the most harmful events in European history. Elements of Toryism on the other hand were quite intransigent when it came to the _Church of England_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_England) as the established church, some even spurning their original _legitimist_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legitimists) ultra-royalist principles in regards to _James II_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_II_of_England) to uphold it. Much of _Dorothy L. Sayers_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorothy_L._Sayers) ' writings on social and economic matters has affinity with distributism. She may have been influenced by them, or have come to similar conclusions on her own; as an _Anglican_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglicanism) , the reasonings she gave are rooted in the theologies of _Creation_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genesis_creation_narrative) and _Incarnation_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incarnation_(Christianity)) , and thus are slightly different from the Catholic Chesterton and Belloc. Some political parties that endorse distributism such as the _Democratic Labour Party (Australia)_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Labour_Party_(Australia)) would be considered to be economically _centre-left_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centre-left) , suggesting that distributism could be seen as _centre-left_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centre-left) by at least some standards. Economic theory Private property Under such a system, most people would be able to earn a living without having to rely on the use of the _property_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_property) of others to do so. Examples of people earning a living in this way would be farmers who own their own land and related machinery, plumbers who own their own tools, software developers who own their own computer,_[34]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-34) etc. The "cooperative" approach advances beyond this perspective to recognise that such property and equipment may be "co-owned" by local communities larger than a family, e.g., partners in a business. In Rerum novarum, Leo XIII states that people are likely to work harder and with greater commitment if they themselves possess the land on which they labour, which in turn will benefit them and their families as workers will be able to provide for themselves and their household. He puts forward the idea that when men have the opportunity to possess property and work on it, they will “learn to love the very soil which yields in response to the labor of their hands, not only food to eat, but an abundance of the good things for themselves and those that are dear to them.” _[35]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-35) He states also that owning property is not only beneficial for a person and their family, but is in fact a right, due to God having “...given the earth for the use and enjoyment of the whole human race”._[36]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-36) Similar views are presented by G.K. Chesterton in his 1910 book What’s Wrong with the World. Chesterton believes that whilst God has limitless capabilities, man has limited abilities in terms of creation. As such, man therefore is entitled to own property and to treat it as he sees fit. He states “ Property is merely the art of the democracy. It means that every man should have something that he can shape in his own image, as he is shaped in the image of heaven. But because he is not God, but only a graven image of God, his self-expression must deal with limits; properly with limits that are strict and even small.”_[37]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-37) Chesterton summed up his distributist views in the phrase "_Three acres and a cow_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_acres_and_a_cow) ". According to Belloc, the distributive state (the state which has implemented distributism) contains "an agglomeration of families of varying wealth, but by far the greater number of owners of the means of production."_[38]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_no te-38) This broader distribution does not extend to all property, but only to productive property; that is, that property which produces wealth, namely, the things needed for man to survive. It includes land, tools, and so on._[39]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-ineioq-39) Distributism allows for society to have public goods such as parks and transit systems. Guild system The kind of economic order envisaged by the early distributist thinkers would involve the return to some sort of _guild_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guild) system. The present existence of _labor unions_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade_union) does not constitute a realization of this facet of distributist economic order, as labour unions are organized along _class_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_class) lines to promote class interests and frequently _class struggle_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_struggle) , whereas guilds are mixed class syndicates composed of both employers and employees cooperating for mutual benefit, thereby promoting _class collaboration_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_collaboration) . Banks Distributism favors the dissolution of the current _private bank_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_bank) system, or more specifically its _profit_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profit_(economics)) -making basis in charging interest. Dorothy Day, for example, suggested[_according to whom?_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_weasel_words) ] abolishing legal enforcement of interest-rate contracts (_usury_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usury) ). It would not entail _nationalization_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationalization) but could involve government involvement of some sort. Distributists look favorably on _credit unions_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credit_union) as a preferable alternative to banks. Anti-trust legislation Distributism appears to have one of its greatest influences in _anti-trust legislation_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-trust_legislation) in America and Europe designed to break up monopolies and excessive concentration of market power in one or only a few companies, _trusts_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust_(monopoly)) , interests, or _cartels_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartel) . Embodying the philosophy explained by Chesterton, above, that too much capitalism means too few capitalists, not too many, America's extensive system of anti-trust legislation seeks to prevent the concentration of market power in a given industry into too-few hands. Requiring that no company gain too great a share of any market is an example of how distributism has found its way into _government policy_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Competition_law) . The assumption behind this legislation is the idea that having economic activity decentralized among many different industry participants is better for the economy than having one or a few large players in an industry. (Note that anti-trust regulation does take into account cases when only large companies are viable because of the nature of an industry, as in the case of _natural monopolies_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_monopoly) like electricity distribution. It also accepts that mergers and acquisitions may improve consumer welfare; however, it generally prefers more _economic agents_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_(economics)) to fewer, as this generally improves _competition_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Competition_(economics)) .) _Social credit_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_credit) Social credit is an interdisciplinary distributive philosophy developed by _C. H. Douglas_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._H._Douglas) (1879–1952), a British engineer, who wrote a book by that name in 1924. It encompasses the fields of economics, political science, history, accounting, and physics. Its policies are designed, according to Douglas, to disperse economic and political power to individuals. Social theory Human family Distributism sees the family of two parents and their child or children as the central and primary _social unit_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_unit) of human ordering and the principal unit of a functioning distributist society and civilization. This unit is also the basis of a multi-generational _extended family_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_family) , which is embedded in socially as well as genetically inter-related communities, nations, etc., and ultimately in the whole human family past, present and future. The economic system of a society should therefore be focused primarily on the flourishing of the family unit, but not in isolation: at the appropriate level of family context, as is intended in the principle of subsidiarity. Distributism reflects this doctrine most evidently by promoting the family, rather than the individual, as the basic type of owner; that is, distributism seeks to ensure that most families, rather than most individuals, will be owners of productive property. The family is, then, vitally important to the very core of distributist thought. Subsidiarity Main article: _Subsidiarity_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsidiarity) Distributism puts great emphasis on the principle of subsidiarity. This principle holds that no larger unit (whether social, economic, or political) should perform a function which can be performed by a smaller unit. _Pope Pius XI_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Pius_XI) , in _Quadragesimo anno_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadragesimo_anno) , provided the classical statement of the principle: "Just as it is gravely wrong to take from individuals what they can accomplish by their own initiative and industry and give it to the community, so also it is an injustice and at the same time a grave evil and disturbance of right order to assign to a greater and higher association what lesser and subordinate organizations can do."_[40]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note- uywdmd-40) Thus, any activity of production (which distributism holds to be the most important part of any economy) ought to be performed by the smallest possible unit. This helps support distributism's argument that smaller units, families if possible, ought to be in control of the means of production, rather than the large units typical of modern economies. _Pope Pius XI_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Pius_XI) further stated, again in _Quadragesimo anno_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadragesimo_anno) , "every social activity ought of its very nature to furnish help to the members of the body social, and never destroy and absorb them."_[39]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_no te-ineioq-39) To prevent large private organizations from thus dominating the body politic, distributism applies this principle of subsidiarity to economic as well as to social and political action. The essence of subsidiarity is concisely inherent in the Christian maxim 'Give someone a fish and you feed him for a day; teach the person to fish and you feed him for a lifetime'.[_original research?_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research) ] Social security Distributism favors the elimination of _social security_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_security) on the basis that it further alienates man by making him more dependent on the _Servile State_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Servile_State) . Distributists such as _Dorothy Day_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorothy_Day) did not favor social security when it was introduced by the United States government. This rejection of this new program was due to the direct influence of the ideas of _Hilaire Belloc_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilaire_Belloc) over American Distributists. Society of artisans Distributism promotes a society of _artisans_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artisan) and culture. This is influenced by an emphasis on small business, promotion of local culture, and favoring of small production over capitalistic _mass production_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_production) . A society of artisans promotes the distributist ideal of the unification of capital, ownership, and production rather than what distributism sees as an _alienation_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_alienation) of man from work. This does not, however, suggest that distributism necessarily favors a technological regression to a pre-_Industrial Revolution_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_Revolution) lifestyle, but a more local ownership of factories and other industrial centers. Products such as food and clothing would be preferably returned to local producers and artisans instead of being mass-produced overseas. Geopolitical theory Political order Distributism does not favor one political order over another (_political accidentalism_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Political_accidentalism&action=edit&redlink=1) ). While some distributists, such as Dorothy Day, have been _anarchists_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism) , it should be remembered that most Chestertonian distributists are opposed to the mere concept of anarchism. Chesterton thought that Distributism would benefit from the discipline that theoretical analysis imposes, and that distributism is best seen as a widely encompassing concept inside of which any number of interpretations and perspectives can fit. This concept should fit in a political system broadly characterized by widespread ownership of productive property._[41]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-41) Political parties The Brazilian political party, _Humanist Party of Solidarity_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanist_Party_of_Solidarity) is a distributist party, and distributism has influenced _Christian Democratic parties_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_democratic_parties) in Continental Europe and the _Democratic Labor Party_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Labour_Party_(Australia)) in Australia. _Ross Douthat_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ross_Douthat) and _Reihan Salam_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reihan_Salam) view their Grand New Party, a roadmap for revising the _Republican Party in the United States_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_(United_States)) , as "a book written in the distributist tradition."_[42]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-42) War Distributists usually use _Just War Theory_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_War_Theory) in determining whether a war should be fought or not. Historical positions of distributist thinkers provides insight into a distributist position on war. Both Belloc and Chesterton opposed British imperialism in general, as well as specifically opposing the _Second Boer War_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Boer_War) , but supported British involvement in _World War I_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_I) . On the other hand, prominent distributists such as Dorothy Day and those involved in the Catholic Worker movement were/are strict _pacifists_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacifism) even to the point of condemning involvement in the Second World War at much personal cost. Influence E. F. Schumacher Distributism is known to have had an influence on the economist _E. F. Schumacher_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._F._Schumacher) , a convert to Catholicism. Mondragon Corporation The _Mondragon Corporation_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondragon_Corporation) , based in the _Basque Country_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basque_Country_(historical_territory)) in a region of Spain and France, was founded by a Catholic priest, Father _José María Arizmendiarrieta_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/José_María_Arizmendiarrieta) , who seems to have been influenced by the same Catholic social and economic teachings that inspired Belloc, Chesterton, McNabb and the other founders of distributism.[_citation needed_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_needed) ][_original research?_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research) ] The Guild of St Joseph and St Dominic Distributist ideas were put into practice by _The Guild of St Joseph and St Dominic_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Guild_of_St_Joseph_and_St_Dominic) , a group of artists and craftsmen who established a community in _Ditchling_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ditchling) , Sussex, England, in 1920, with the motto 'Men rich in virtue studying beautifulness living in peace in their houses'. The Guild sought to recreate an idealised medieval lifestyle in the manner of the _Arts and Crafts Movement_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arts_and_Crafts_Movement) ; it survived almost 70 years, until 1989. Big Society The _Big Society_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Society) was the flagship policy idea of the 2010 _UK Conservative Party general election manifesto_ (https://en .wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_UK_Conservative_Party_general_election_manifestos) . Some distributists claim that the rhetorical marketing of this policy was influenced by aphorisms of the distributist ideology and promotes distributism._[43]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-DR21Jul-43) It purportedly formed a part of the legislative programme of the _Conservative – Liberal Democrat Coalition Agreement_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_– _Liberal_Democrat_Coalition_Agreement) ._[44]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-BBC18May-44) The stated aim is "to create a climate that empowers local people and communities, building a big society that will 'take power away from politicians and give it to people'"._[45]_ (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Distributism&printable=yes#cite_note-PM18May-45) There is considerable debate as to whether this vision is borne out by government policies that allegedly have tended to support growing inequality and an economy increasingly dependent on an affluent "financial class" whose interests are entirely based on a globalized form of market capitalism. -- -- Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community <[email protected]> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
