Why the Paris Massacre Will Have Limited Impact
by Daniel Pipes
_National Review Online_ 
(http://www.nationalreview.com/article/427087/paris-attacks-islam-public-opinion?target=author&tid=900923)
 
November 14,  2015 
 
The murder of some 127 innocents in Paris by a jihadi gang on Friday has  
again shocked the French and led to another round of solidarity, soul 
searching,  and anger. In the end, however, Islamist violence against 
Westerners 
boils down  to two questions: How much will this latest atrocity turn public 
opinion? And  how much will it further spur the Establishment to deny 
reality? 
As these questions suggest, the people and the professionals are moving in  
opposite directions, the former to the right, the latter to the left. In 
the  end, this clash much reduces the impact of such events on policy. 
Public opinion moves against Islamists specifically and Islam more 
generally  when the number of deaths are large enough. America's three thousand 
dead 
on  9/11 stands out as by far the largest mortality but many other 
countries have  had their equivalent – the Bali bombings for Australia, the 
railroad 
bombing for  Spain, the Beslan school massacre for Russia, the 
transportation bombings for  Britain. 
Sheer numbers are not the only consideration. Other factors can multiply 
the  impact of an assault, making it almost the political equivalent of mass 
carnage:  (1) The renown of those attacked, such as Theo van Gogh in the 
Netherlands and  the Charlie Hebdo office in France. (2) The professional 
status 
of the  victim, such as soldiers or police. (3) High-profile circumstances, 
such as the  Boston Marathon bombing. 
In addition to the over 27,000 attacks globally connected to Islam  since 
9/11, or more than 5 per day (as counted by TheReligionOfPeace.com), a  huge 
increase in illegal immigration from the Middle East recently exacerbated  
feelings of vulnerability and fear. It's a one-way street, with not a single  
soul ever heard to announce, "I used to worry about Islamism but I don't 
any  more." 
These cases make more Westerners worried about Islam and related topics 
from  the building of minarets to female infibulation. Overall, a relentless 
march  rightwards is underway. _Surveys  of European attitudes_ 
(http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2013/11/anti-islam-trumps-islam-in-the-west)  
show 60 to 
70 percent of voters expressing these  concerns. Populist individuals like 
_Geert  Wilders_ 
(http://www.trouw.nl/tr/nl/4492/Nederland/article/detail/4181271/2015/11/08/Wilders-PVV-virtueel-naar-38-zetels.dhtml)
  of the 
Netherlands and parties like the _Sweden  Democrats_ 
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_general_election,_2018)  are surging in 
the polls. 
But when it comes to the Establishment – politicians, the police, the 
press,  and the professors – the unrelenting violence has a contrary effect. 
Those  charged with interpreting the attacks live in a bubble of public denial 
(what  they say privately is another matter) in which they feel compelled to 
pretend  that Islam has no role in the violence, out of concern that to 
recognize it  would _cause even more  problems_ 
(http://www.danielpipes.org/12604/islam-role-terror) . 
These 4-P professionals bald-facedly feign belief in a mysterious "violent  
extremist" virus that seems to afflict only Muslims, prompting them to 
engage in  random acts of barbaric violence. Of the many _preposterous 
statements  by politicians_ (http://www.danielpipes.org/15618/islam-violence) , 
my 
all-time favorite is what _Howard  Dean_ 
(http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/01/07/howard_dean_on_paris_attack_i_stopped_calling_these_people_musl
im_terrorists.html) , the former governor of Vermont, said about the 
Charlie Hebdo  jihadis: "They're about as Muslim as I am." 
This defiance of common sense has survived each atrocity and I predict that 
 it will also outlast the Paris massacre. Only a truly massive loss of 
life,  perhaps in the hundreds of thousands, will force the professionals to 
back off  their deeply ingrained pattern of denying an Islamic component in the 
spate of  attacks. 
That pattern has the very consequential effect of shutting out the fears of 
 ordinary voters, whose views thereby have negligible impact on policy. 
Worries  about _Shari'a_ 
(http://www.thomasnelson.com/cruel-and-usual-punishment) , _rape  gangs_ 
(http://www.bbc.
com/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-28939089) , _exotic  diseases_ 
(http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/6838/germany-migration-health-crisis) , and 
bloodbaths are dismissed with charges of 
"racism" and  "Islamophobia," as though name-calling addresses these real 
issues. 
More surprising yet, the professionals respond to the public's move to the  
right by themselves moving to the left, encouraging more immigration from 
the  Middle East, instituting more "hate speech" codes to suppress criticism 
of  Islam, and providing more patronage to Islamists. This pattern affects 
not just  Establishment figures of the Left but more strikingly also of the 
Right (such as  Angela Merkel of Germany); only Eastern European leaders such 
as Hungary's  Viktor Orbán permit themselves to speak honestly about the 
real  problems.

 
 
Eventually, to be sure, voters' views will make themselves heard, but 
decades  later and more weakly than democratically should have been the case. 
Placing the murderous rampage in Paris into this context: it will likely 
move  public sentiments substantially in one direction and Establishment 
policies in  quite the opposite way, therefore ultimately having only a limited 
 
impact.

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to