from the site:
_Occident  Invicta, The Unconquered West_ (http://occidentinvicta.com/)  
 
 
 
 
 
The Radical Center
Posted on _October 26,  2015_ 
(http://occidentinvicta.com/2015/10/26/the-radical-center/)  by _Bay Area Guy_ 
(http://occidentinvicta.com/author/lordtywi
n/)  
 
During my _first  interview _ (http://www.starktruthradio.com/?p=351) with 
Robert Stark, Robert and I concurred that the best  ideological platform 
would be an eclectic mix of Pat Buchanan and Ralph  Nader’s beliefs. We further 
discussed this stance when hanging  out in SF, and Robert even requested 
that I dedicate a post to this  issue. On account of the presidential campaign 
heating up, I figure  that now is as good a time as any to honor his 
request and expand on this  topic. 
The main reason why I find this presidential race exciting is  because the 
beliefs espoused by both Pat Buchanan and Ralph Nader are  enjoying a 
widespread hearing. Among the Democrats, an avowed democratic  socialist Bernie 
Sanders is posing a real challenge to Hillary Clinton. A  remnant of the old 
left – which was spearheaded by unions and economic  progressives like Nader –
 an ascendant Sanders seeks to place economics at  the forefront of 
political discourse. His primary focus on regular working  people has provoked 
the 
ire of both _#BlackLivesMatter activists_ 
(http://dailycaller.com/2015/08/11/black-lives-matter-protestor-rips-the-progressive-bernie-sanders-video/)
  
and neoliberal_ open borders fanatics_ 
(http://www.cepr.net/blogs/beat-the-press/dylan-matthews-is-upset-that-bernie-sanders-thinks-that-u-s-citizens-shou
ld-live-better-than-chadians) . 
Speaking of neoliberals, while the Clintons cluelessly insist that  they 
struggle just like everyone else – despite collecting _millions_ 
(https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-the-clintons-went-from-dead-broke-to-rich-bil
l-earned-1049-million-for-speeches/2014/06/26/8fa0b372-fd3a-11e3-8176-f2c941
cf35f1_story.html)  in speaking fees from big corporations – Sanders  
possesses a certain verisimilitude; he strikes me as one of the few politicians 
 
who actually gives a crap about the plight of average Americans. Even though 
he  won’t likely win, his candidacy is at least causing more people to  
privilege economic issues over SJW causes. 
Among Republicans, such authenticity manifests itself in the form  of 
Donald Trump’s insurgency. Unlike mainstream cuckservatives who refuse  to 
aggressively take the fight to the left, Trump tells it like it is. Whether  
he’s 
aggressively denouncing illegal immigration, heaping obloquy on feckless  
American elites, condemning disastrous trade deals, or questioning this  
country’s absurd foreign policy, _the spirit of Pat Buchanan_ 
(http://www.nationalreview.com/article/423294/donald-trump-pat-buchanan-heir)  
is galvanizing 
growing  numbers of white Americans. 
Without trying to rain on the alt right’s parade, I’m certain that Trump  
won’t become president. Unless he can win the primary and then siphon  off a 
huge chunk of white Democrats during the general election, a  Democratic 
victory is a foregone conclusion. The venal and moronic Republicans  refused 
to stymie the tide of immigration and preserve a solid white majority  while 
they still had the chance. As they say, demography is destiny, and  
demographics are not in the Republicans’ favor. 
Nevertheless, Trump’s rise is positive in terms of its cultural impact.  
Thanks to the Donald, nationalistic sentiment is being rendered less taboo. 
The  fact that his popularity  only increased following his inflammatory  
comments on Mexicans and China is testament to the growth of a certain white  
consciousness. His success has likewise been a boon for the  alternative 
right; it’s no coincidence that Donald Trump’s assault on  Conservatism Inc 
coincides with the emergence of _“cuckservative._ 
(http://occidentinvicta.com/2015/07/28/what-to-make-of-cuckservative/) ” 
On the topic of the alt right, I would say that it embodies the best of  
Pat Buchanan while lacking the better qualities of Ralph Nader. One of  my 
critiques of the alt right is that – exceptions such as _Hunter Wallace_ 
(http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2015/10/28/the-libertarian-legend/)  and 
_Matt  
Forney_ (http://mattforney.com/going-postal-mark-ames/)  notwithstanding – 
they mostly neglect economic matters. I suspect  that much of this can be 
chalked up to a generational divide; after all, it’s no  coincidence that 
Wallace, Forney, and myself hail from a younger, more  economically beleaguered 
generation than older WNs or alt righters such as Jared  Taylor. As much as I 
respect these older intellectuals, it behooves them to  address economic 
malaise if they wish to attract more young people to  their movements. Just 
look at the _popularity_ 
(https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/in-bernie-sanders-anxious-millennials-find-a-candidate-who-speaks-to-them/2015/10/27/923d
0b74-66cc-11e5-9223-70cb36460919_story.html)  Bernie Sanders enjoys among 
white millennials.  There’s no reason why the alt right couldn’t tap into 
this frustration and make  inroads with whites who are economically anxious 
but also don’t think  highly of SJWs. 
Since I’m part of the alt right blogosphere, my criticism is meant to be  
purely constructive. On a fundamental level, the alt right is mostly correct. 
I  simply believe that certain elements should scrap their obsession with 
the Joos,  extirpate _Ayn Randian sentiment_ 
(http://alternative-right.blogspot.com/2015/04/disdain-for-fat-plebs-patrick-bateman.html)
 , and branch out 
into other topics. I  likewise feel that one shouldn’t have to rigidly 
adhere to ideological  purity just to remain in the good graces of the 
movement. 
As my friend Robert Lindsay pointed out during one of _his interviews_ 
(http://www.starktruthradio.com/?p=1515)   with Robert Stark, it is ridiculous 
to pigeonhole people as purely “liberal” or  “conservative.” One could also 
add “white nationalist” and “paleoconservative”  to the mix. 
I think it’s fair to say that in some ways I’m a radical centrist. Of  
course, as Robert Stark told Robert Lindsay, being a centrist does not entail  
having no convictions and simply accommodating the status quo. For me, being 
a  radical centrist means embracing the best aspects of myriad ideologies, 
and then  using them to speak out against enemies of the West. I don’t have 
to  conform to every alt right talking point in order to advocate for my 
people; I  don’t have to subscribe to HBD to defend the legitimacy of my race. 
As much  as I bash the left, I’ll use certain leftist arguments when need  
be – _immigration_ 
(http://occidentinvicta.com/2014/04/02/render-unto-cesar-lessons-from-cesar-chavez/)
  being a perfect example. 
In conclusion, I think that there’s much to be said for a radical centrism, 
 and I can certainly understand why Robert Lindsay gets frustrated when 
people  are so quick to attach simplistic ideological labels to others. It’s 
actually  kind of sad that today’s left has grown so unhinged that people 
associate Robert  with an “alternative left.” Without trying to reduce someone 
as complex as  Robert to a single description, Robert represents the kind of 
sane, economic  left that once existed throughout the first half of the 
20th century. Since  leftists like Robert are an endangered species, I get 
where he’s coming  from when he insists that he’s politically homeless. 
Even though I can relate to Robert’s angst, I’m very much grateful to be a 
 part of the alt right. Even when certain commenters spew vitriol my way, I’
m  always happy whenever a certain article of mine provides value to the  
community. 
At the end of the day, ideological purity should be discarded in  favor of 
a radical, yet flexible, center. I’ll accept any and all truths that  can be 
deployed in defense of our dying nations. 
=========================== 
About Us- 
Bay Area Guy 
I am a young white American man who is an ethnic mix of Greek and  Nordic.
I was born and raised in the San Francisco Bay Area, but pursued  my
college education in Southern California. I received a BA in history and  
am now working part-time while studying for grad school. My primary topics  
of interest are history, multiculturalism, immigration, and economics. 
Dota 
I am Indian by ethnicity, a Muslim by religion, and a Canadian by  
nationality. I immigrated to Canada 10 years ago from Dubai and completed my  
Bachelors of Business Administration in Toronto before moving to Saskatoon 
where  
I currently reside. Like my co-blogger, I have a passion for History in 
addition  to some Philosophy. 
Why we do this 
Like most North Americans we too were born with a political consciousness  
that was liberal oriented at its inception. We took classes in the 
humanities  and social sciences disciplines where liberal professors challenged 
the 
dominant  ideologies of patriarchy and colonialism while substituting those 
ideologies  with new ones: Feminism, Post modernism, and Communism. We 
realize today that  the latter ideologies are not only antithetical to the 
foundational values of  western civilization, but are also corrosive to the 
fabric 
of western societies.  This website is intended to serve as a rallying point 
for free thinking  individuals that wish to preserve the ethnic (white) and 
religious (Christian)  character of Western societies. We hold a dim view 
of colonialism, imperialism,  and blatant racism; but we equally condemn 
white bashing, Christian bashing,  Multiculturalism, and Male bashing. We 
categorically reject the  anti-foundationalist ontology that serves as the base 
for most modern left wing  perspectives in favour of a  strong European and 
Christian identity for the  west. 
What makes us different 
Unlike the legion of political pundits, academics, and media whores out 
there  that impose the voice and will of the minority, we speak on behalf of 
the silent  and loathed majority. We do not make a single cent of this website 
because this  endeavour is a labour of love. We aren’t paid to do what we 
do here and our  drive is born out of a sense of urgency; that Cultural 
Marxist and Liberal  trends portend a dark future for Western Civilization. We 
are two ordinary men  that study and work 9 to 5 jobs. We are one of you and 
we fight for you 
-------------------------- 
We are not race deniers here, we subscribe to the definition of race as a  
genetically differentiated population. Race is not the focus of this website 
 however, it is culture. When race becomes a subject of inquiry, we 
approach it  through a scientific lens instead of an ideological one. For 
example, 
we believe  that the differences between racial groups are mostly 
physiological instead of  psychological. So while we might occasionally concede 
that 
Race A has a higher  level of tolerance towards certain illnesses while being 
susceptible to others,  we will never say that Race A is more prone to 
crime and violence on account of  their genetics. We believe that all men are 
equal in the eyes of God and we  reject any notion of racial hierarchies. 
That being said, we do not apply the maxim of equality to cultures. We  
believe that certain cultures are superior to others. As Paleoconservatives, we 
 believe in normalizing Anglo culture within North American societies in 
addition  to reserving the right to critique and deconstruct foreign cultures. 
We believe  that some of the cultures outside the west are simply nasty and 
brutish and  should be left alone. We strongly object to our two nations 
participating in  imperialist jaunts and world policing assignments in favour 
of reducing  immigration and preserving traditional western values at home. 
We also oppose  any attempts made by our two nations to impose western 
values onto non western  societies. Our values and moral beliefs are predicated 
upon multiple layers of  factual beliefs, many of which remain inaccessible 
to foreign cultures and thus  our moral values would be incomprehensible to 
them; as their beliefs would  likewise be inaccessible to us. 
Race versus ethnicity 
The three Racial groupings tend to be rather broad and  somewhat ambiguous 
at times (where to classify Australoids?). From a purely  genetic point of 
view, Bay Area Guy and myself are part of the same race as  Higher caste 
Indians (such as myself) cluster closer towards Europeans (see  Sforza). 
However 
this is a meaningless association as we are also members of 2  very 
distinct groups, culturally, geographically, and linguistically. 

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to