Islam, homosexuals, and Donald Trump   
 
  

 
 
 
On February 19, 2016, as reported by Jeremy Diamond of CNN.
Donald Trump told a funny story about Muslims; it had  pretty much 
the same quality as other funny stories he has told on the campaign trail, 
i.e., it really wasn't very funny and its appeal was primarily to the  
uneducated. 
However, this humorous vignette now takes on unexpected significance. 
I won't keep you in suspense. Here is Trump's story, for your edification, 
exactly as reported at the CNN website:
.
"Speaking at a rally in North Charleston, South Carolina, Trump reiterated 
his claim that the U.S. should "go much further" than waterboarding  
suspected 
terrorists, telling the story of Gen. John Pershing in the Philippines, who 
Trump said captured 50 Muslim prisoners a century ago and 
dipped 50 bullets in blood."
.
 
"And he lined up the 50 people and they shot 49 of  those 50 people, 
and he said to the 50th, you go back to your  people and you tell them 
what happened -- and in 25 years there wasn't a  problem," Trump said 
to the audience, which grew quiet as he told the  story."

.
That was four months ago. 
.
.
An interesting thing happened in the early AM hours of  June 12.
A Muslim of Afghan extraction named Omar Mir Seddique Mateen
went to a night club in Orlando, Florida, and opened fire with a
semi-automatic assault rifle and a Glock handgun and mowed down
103 patrons of "Pulse," as the establishment is called, all or nearly all 
of them homosexuals.
.
Two different tallies of the dead and wounded are current, one which
includes all the dead including the shooter, the other only counting
the murdered victims. The final number is 49 or 50 dead, depending  on
how you count, with 53 wounded or injured.
.
You might want to compare these numbers with the figures in the
funny story Trump told in February inasmuch as they are identical,
49 and 50.
.
The gunman's death was confirmed at exactly 5: 53 AM after  SWAT officers
entered the building when a wall was breached by their armored  vehicle
and began shooting.
.
Exactly what to make of these coincidences is up to you to decide for  
yourself
but this certainly deserves attention if for no other reason than the  
numbers
cannot be wished away. At a minimum this is very creepy. But wait, 
this gets even more creepy.
.
If you are curious and start to dig into the story there are still more  
coincidences.
For example, what about the number "25"? After all, Trump's funny  story
mentioned 25 years as a benchmark. There is no obvious 25 in the  story
of the Pulse nightclub massacre but reports about the event  frequently
tell us that the number of dead exceeds the total for the previous 
worst mass killings of homosexuals.
.
There is plenty of information about that crime available on the Web,  
something
that took place in New Orleans on June 24, 1973, at the UpStairs  Lounge,
also a homosexual bar. In that mass killing 32 individuals died after  the
lounge was set on fire in an arson attack by a homosexual who had
been a patron, Rodger Dale Nunez. At least Nunez is the most likely
suspect. Police were never able to find conclusive evidence to convict 
him but he had motive  -he had been kicked out a short time before  the
fire- and he was placed nearby by several witnesses at the time in  
question.
Those deaths may have given him a motive for suicide in 1974.
.
Where this gets interesting is that the UpStairs Lounge, that day, was  
being 
used by the New Orleans homosexual Metropolitan Community Church
As the Wikipedia article on the fire reports, the MCC "held services inside 
the club" and "after the service, the club hosted free beer and dinner 
for 125 patrons.
.
This fact suggests a question about the Metropolitan Community  Church
of Orlando. Is there any kind of connection? About this, you can  decide.
Perhaps this is only curious but for your information   Joy Metropolitan 
Community Church,  the only one in Orlando, is located in the  same
neighborhood as the Pulse nightclub. Each is roughly equidistant from
Lake Lancaster (which is within Orlando proper), the church to the East 
of the lake, the nightclub somewhat to the West. Maps show both 
places within or next to the South Division neighborhood. Each is 
only a few blocks from the lake.
.
What most separates the two institutions is demography, not  geography.
About 90% of  the homosexuals at the Pulse nightclub were Hispanics,  half
of Puerto Rican ancestry; however the Hispanic population  of South Division
is less than 5%. Not sure what to make of this, but for your  information.
.
Where this gets more interesting is that Joy MCC organized a vigil for 
the shooting victims;  while information currently  available isn't 
entirely clear, 
this seems to have been an official event which the mayor attended on  
Monday 
evening, outdoors at the city center. On Sunday evening there was  another 
event,
inside the church building, with standing room only, at which Troy  Perry,
the founder of the national Metropolitan Community Church, spoke by  way
of a teleconference call. Perry is quite old now and retired from his  
leadership
post in 2005. But he wanted to address the group as he had done in 1973 
for the MCC members who died in the bar fire when he was able to 
fly into New Orleans for that occasion.
.
What was odd was that a minister of Joy MCC made sure to read a  "prayer
of Muhammad's," apparently from the Koran  -as reported in the  Washington 
Post
for June 13, 2016. The killer, of course, went to lengths to make sure  that
everyone in the world knew that he had been inspired by Islam. About  which
the evidence is overwhelming  -all of it known to the White  House within
a few hours of the attack.
.
There were, of course, three 911 calls that Omar Mateen made during  lulls
in the shooting while he was inside the nightclub. During these calls he  
made
it clear that he was inspired by the Islamic State and its leader, to whom  
he
pledged allegiance. This is not a misprint; Mateen did not  pledge loyalty 
to
the Christian State or the Buddhist State or any other organization  except
Daesh, aka, the Islamic State, a Muslim association. 
.
Mateen also visited Saudi Arabia in 2011 and 2012 in order to take part  in
the hajj, the pilgrimage to Mecca. This is, in case some people have  
difficulty
with the concept, a well known Muslim ritual. 
.
Amaq News Agency, an online organization which is owned  by Daesh,
affirmed Mateen's claim by saying that the attack against homosexuals
in Florida was the responsibility of  "an Islamic State fighter".  Another
Islamic State group, radio station al-Bayan, added that Mateen was a

"soldier of the caliphate."  The Islamic State also produced a  video
lionizing the murderer.
.
It seems that Mateen was associated with  The Husseini Islamic Center, 
an institution found in Sanford, a suburb of Orlando. Worth knowing about 
this organization is that not long before the mass killings, apparently  
just 
a few days,  Sheikh Farrokh Sekaleshfar spoke there and as the  headline 
at EarthWatch21 put it:
Muslim  Imam in Orlando called for death to gays before night club attack 
At the time of this writing a video about the visit had received 52,  617 
views.
.
There was also a report provided by WFTV 9; this  said:
Gays Must Die Says Speaker At Orlando Mosque
.
All reports agree that Sekaleshfar told his listeners that the Koran  is 
very clear that homosexuals should be killed and that since their sin 
is heinous before God it would be an act of mercy to cause them to 
cease sinning by ending their lives. 
.
A British news analysis show told its audience that the sheikh insisted  
that
Muslims must kill homosexuals if they have the opportunity. However it  has
not been possible to confirm this account. Indeed, the Florida press  said
that the sheikh was careful to parse his words, adding  that Muslim 
teaching 
does not apply in the United States which does not observe Shariah  law.
.
Regardless, it seems that the sheikh got his point across.  All  Muslims 
know 
that their first allegiance is to their religion and if  local law  does 
not agree 
with Koran-inspired Shariah law, whenever the opportunity exists 
Shariah should be enforced.
.
It also turns out that Mateen  was a student of an online Muslim "school" 
 
called the Fundamental Islamic Knowledge Seminary. This is the work  of








Marcus Robertson a  zealous Muslim cleric of some kind. Robertson  lives 
in England. He had been investigated by British law enforcement  agencies
several times but no charges were ever brought despite the fact that  he 
had 
espoused ideas associated with Anwar al-Awlaki, the American al-Qaeda 
leader who had inspired Major Nidal Hasan, the Muslim psychiatrist who 
killed 13 service personnel and wounded 30 others at Ft. Hood, Texas.
.
Not only all this, but people who knew Mateen from work in Florida have  
said
that he frequently told them that he supported Hezbollah as well as  the 
Islamic
State. Some people have attempted to use this information to try and  
discredit
Mateen's Muslim bona fides inasmuch as these two groups are  currently
in conflict with each other as a side effect of the civil war  in Syria, 
but that
point is rather weak inasmuch as the two groups have co-operated in  the 
past 
and both are anti-homosexual and anti-Semitic (Judeophobic), which, of  
course,
were favorite targets of Mateen's hatred all along. We also do not  know
if  Mateen was all that concerned about Mid East religious  politics; he 
seems
to have been motivated primarily by what we would call social issues
as they played out in his local environment.
.
All this and  -incredibly-  numbers of homosexuals are now  blaming
Christians for the mass murders of homosexuals. There are several  reports
to this effect such as a completely ludicrous screed at Religion &  
Politics blog,
but the story by columnist Michael Brown in the June 14 issue of the 
Christian Post can be taken as representative. The logic is  that
Christians preach hate of homosexuals and therefore any and all acts 
of violence against themselves must necessarily be caused by  Christians.
.
 
There are several things wrong with this line of (half-baked)  thought:
.
*  For instance, and Mr. Brown is a classic example, many Christians 
these days are running for the exits. They want nothing to do with
the Bible's strong condemnations of sodomy and use every stratagem
possible to deny these condemnations, mostly by the evasion that
Jesus taught love and therefore we should love everyone on principle
including homosexuals. 
.
Did Jesus condemn homosexuals to Hell in Matthew 11? Did the Apostle Paul 
condemn them to death (as required by Roman law of his time) as stated 
forcefully in the first chapter of Romans?  Many Christians simply  refuse 
to
acknowledge these major passages in the New Testament. Almost
none are aware that no less than 30 passages in the Bible call sodomy
a horrible sin beyond forgiveness unless it totally  ceases; what you 
usually 
hear are comments that there may be a "few" verses, maybe 4 or 5.
Christian ignorance of the testimony of the Bible is staggering, in  fact.
And anyone who has attended an Evangelical church in the past 
few years can tell you exactly this. There are exceptions but
that is what they are, exceptions.
.
*  Psychological research on the subject of homosexuality is  increasingly
clear to the effect that homosexuality is a grievous psychopathology.
A few names of researchers of this issue, starting with the late Dr.  
Charles 
Socarides, include Neil Whitehead,  Joseph Nicolosi, Stanton  Jones,
Dr. Judith Reisman, Dr. Paul Cameron, O.R. Adams, Claude  Crepault,
Kathleen Melonakos, Mark Yarhouse, and still others. But their  findings 
are seldom (almost never) reported in the  mainstream media. However, 
this does not mean that this research does not exist.  And the fact is that 
by just about all relevant measures, extraordinary rates  of substance 
abuse, 
off-the-charts rates of homosexual vs. homosexual  violence for both sexes, 
 
very high rates of pedophilia, susceptibility to a host  of "lifestyle" 
illnesses 
(like so-called "gay bowel disease" that results from  anal sex), 
psychological maladjustment disorders, and  sociopathological behaviors such as 
in-your-face obnoxiousness, there isn't any real  question that 
homosexuality 
is a mental illness. Given these facts what are people  supposed to do? 
Shut up about it because of considerations of political  correctness?
.
*  Critics of Christians who blame them for Muslim  violence are 
ridiculously
ignorant of the substance of Islam itself.  In countries  where there are no
Christians at all (under 1%) as is the case in places like Yemen  and
Saudi Arabia, anti-homosexual laws are the most severe on  Earth
with the punishment demanded by the Koran  strictly enforced: Death.
In more "liberal" societies like Egypt the penalty is more along the  lines
of imprisonment for periods of 20 years or more. Which is to say  that
Muslims do not need the least coaching from Christians about what to  do
about homosexuals: Kill them. Most Christians  that I have ever known,
which is a large number, take the opposite view, in fact, and seek  to
win homosexuals to Christ peacefully without coercion. It is  widely
assumed that if homosexuals are converted they will naturally  abandon 
their sexual behavior and cease to have pathological  sexual interests.
.
A minority view is that homosexuals need to completely  abandon 
homosexuality 
through whatever means they find necessary before anyone should consider 
accepting them in their church. This also requires  genuine repentance on
the part of homosexuals and major effort on their part to repair the  
damages
caused by their homosexual behavior. This does not make this minority  view
wrong, it simply makes it minority  -for now. At one time it was  the 
majority
view and these people believe it will become majority opinion  again.
.
.
But let us continue with the theme of the bizarre nature of the Omar  Mateen
story. And there is still more weirdness to discuss.
.
Also strange was a news item, also from the Washington Post, 
about the father of the shooter, Mir Seddique. It seems as if the father is 
not entirely rational  -which is only to speak of events before the  mass 
killings. 
This is a reasonable conclusion to reach after reading information in the  
Post 
that  Mr. Seddique has maintained a Youtube channel and his "most  recent 
video
...shows him declaring his candidacy for the Afghan presidency."  From  
Florida   
-for an election that is several years away.
.
This leads to a final line of inquiry, on the subject of presidents. Do any 
 US
presidents figure in the story? Yes, and two presidential  candidates.
.
About Barack Hussein Obama, as one source observed: "In  his comments 
on the atrocity, Obama did call it an act of terror, but he never once  
mentioned 
the words Islam, Islamic or Muslim." And isn't it curious that he was  quick
to label this an act of terror when the victims were all homosexuals  yet
when Major Nidal Hasan killed and wounded a large number of  heterosexual
service men and women he insisted over and over that it was a case
of 'workplace violence'?
.
There was one other reaction from the current administration. As  reported
in the Christian Post for June 13, in a story by Mark Ellis, Obama  has
"appointed a new liaison to the Muslim-American community who has ties 
to the Muslim Brotherhood." The Brotherhood, of course, lost power in  Egypt
for subversive activities that posed a danger to the state. This was just  
after
Hillary Clinton's visit during which she heaped praises on the  Brotherhood
and passed along heartfelt congratulations from Barack Hussein.
.
As the article continued, the "Muslim Brotherhood is labeled a  terrorist 
organization by six countries even if this status was denied by the United  
States
when Obama took office. "The official hired by the White House, Zaki  
Barzinji, 
27, is the former president of the Muslim Youth of North America, which is 
the youth wing of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA)..." This  
group
"is a Muslim Brotherhood entity that was labeled an unindicted  
co-conspirator 
in a Hamas-financing trial." Hamas, of course, is affiliated with the  
Brotherhood
and demands the destruction of the state of Israel.
.
"Barzinji is also the grandson of a Muslim Brotherhood terror suspect, 
Jamal Barzinji, who died last year...." Jamal had been identified as  linked
with just about every Muslim Brotherhood associated Muslim group
active in the United States; he also donated to various  political causes
in America. He "was nearly prosecuted, but the Obama Justice Department 
dropped the planned indictment.”
.
Other interesting facts you may like to know:
.
Obama's new appointee "accepted an award on his grandfather’s behalf in  
2013
at a mosque in Virginia known for having Al-Qaeda operative Anwar al-Awlaki 
as its imam in 2001."
.
"Before his White House appointment, Barzinji served as the deputy director 
 of intergovernmental affairs for Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe."  
Interesting
about McAuliffe is that he "was chairman of Hillary Clinton’s  2008 
presidential 
campaign. He is currently under investigation by the FBI" for illegal  
campaign contributions.
.
There is a connection to "Tariq Ramadan, the grandson of the founder of 
the Muslim Brotherhood. Ramadan was allowed into the United States 
in January 2010 at the direction of then-Secretary of State Hillary  
Clinton, 
whose longtime aide, Huma Abedin, also has extensive personal and 
family ties to the Muslim Brotherhood."
.
.
You might suppose this has meaning in American politics. However,  because
of who is breaking this story you can be certain that everything said  here
will be censored, either de facto or de jure, that lies will be told about  
me
that smear my reputation without any recourse, and even some of my 
friends will make it clear that they have no spines and will not dare  to
challenge the power establishment. 
 
This is not OK but I will continue anyway  -until such time as my  efforts
contribute to wrecking the Democratic Party and marginalizing the  GOP.
I have no use for either of our major political  parties;  I am a political
Independent and proud of it.
.
.
There also is a connection, maybe more indirect than otherwise,  between
Ronald Reagan and the Mateen story. Many Republicans might not like  to
hear it but Reagan has never been a hero of mine and it is a matter  of
complete indifference to me whether his reputation is tarnished by
news that I report about him.
.
This starts with a curiosity about Joy Metropolitan Community Church in  
Orlando.
It seems that this group was officially founded  -chartered by the  state- 
in 1983.
So far the exact date of that occasion has been impossible to find, but  
some time
that year. This was the only year that  Reagan visited Orlando during  his
presidency. About this complete certainty isn't possible but to  report
the fact that the Orlando Sentinel ran a story about Reagan's  March 8
visit of 1983 and when you do a Google search nothing else turns up
-at least for a reasonable number of page searches.
.
Did Reagan meet with any leaders of Joy MCC at that time?  It is very  
unlikely.
However, it would not be good idea to be dismissive of the possibility.  
There is
a small literature of Reagan's views in support of homosexuals. One  example
is provided in a James Duke Mason article in the homosexual  newspaper,
The Advocate, for June 5, 2014. Mason, a self-identified  "progressive
Democrat" said that although Reagan was sluggish in responding to the
AIDS crisis of that era, he had a number of homosexual friends and  
generally
was friendly toward that crowd, especially those in the motion  picture
industry. And he never did anything at all as president to stop or even  
slow 
homosexual political initiatives; in fact, as his  daughter has said, her 
father 
was generally well disposed toward homosexuals.
 
And those of us who were alive at the time remember all too well  Reagan's
eulogy for of actor Rock Hudson, who died from AIDS in 1985.
.
But perhaps the best easily  available source to turn to is an article  by 
Warren Throckmorton that was  published in the September 24, 2010, edition 
of  Patheos.
It seems that Reagan met secretly with homosexuals even if we  do not know 
how frequently and how often. We know this much because one  such meeting 
has subsequently been publicized,  his 1978 get-together  with David Mixner 
and Peter Scott, two "flaming faggots" of the time who were  vehemently 
opposed to the Briggs Initiative in California, aka Proposition 6,  then 
with 
no worse than a 50-50 chance to be approved by voters and become law. 
Measure 6 would have prohibited any public school in the state from  hiring 
homosexual teachers and would have allowed schools to fire teachers 
who advocated homosexuality in their  classes.  Reagan, while no longer 
governor, was widely respected in the state and it has  been generally 
concluded that his public opposition, arm in arm with  Jimmy Carter, 
was responsible for he measure's  defeat.
.
Reagan's secret meeting with Mixner (a very  close friend of William 
Clinton and
his wife Hillary) and Peter Scott was, by  existing accounts, what pushed 
him
over the line into overt opposition to 6. Which  is published fact and a 
fact that
absolutely no conservatives that I have  ever heard of even admit, let along
criticize. In case you might like to know. But  there is more.
.
Reagan also had meetings with Troy Perry, the  founder of the Metropolitan 
Community Church, although no-one is sure how  many meetings there were.
After all, it is the nature of secret meetings  that others do not learn 
about
them except under special circumstances.  However, in Perry's case there
is as close to documented proof as anyone is  likely to find.
.
This concerns events at the time of the official  founding of the MCC, which
took place on March 7, 1971. As page 30 of a  1974 book by Ronald Enroth 
and Gerald Johnson, The Gay Church,  recounted,  on that day then-governor
Reagan sent Troy Perry a letter of  congratulations for starting his 
homosexual
"church."  That is, Reagan was giving his  'seal of approval' to an ersatz 
church
that teaches that Jesus, who condemned  homosexuality, was a homosexual.
 
Perry was disappointed that the governor did not  attend in  person,
giving the impression that he already knew him,  but then adding that he
would be meeting with him on June 25. Also at  that meeting would be  Evelyn
Hooker, very influential in persuading the  American Psychiatric Association
to reclassify homosexuality as less than a  mental illness the year before.
It took a number of years before the fraudulent  nature of Hooker's research
was finally exposed but by then, of course, it  was too late.
 
What was said at the conclave involving Reagan  and Troy Perry is  not 
known 
at this time, and it may not have been secret inasmuch  as Hooker was also 
present,  
but it does establish the fact that Reagan was  friendly with not only 
movieland
homosexuals but those who  represented homosexual religion, a religion that 
 is
the exact opposite of the faith of the millions of evangelical  voters who 
elected 
him to the presidency. 
.
To the best of my knowledge, despite the fact that Enroth and  Johnson's 
book, 
published by a quality Christian company, Eerdmans, had to  have been 
widely  
known, not one conservative of consequence criticized  Reagan for his overt
support of homosexuals. The high profile role of  Joy MCC after the
mass killings at Pulse nightclub in Orlando was  expedited, many years ago,
but the kindness of Ronald Reagan to Troy  Perry.
 
As I have said repeatedly over the years,  although the Democratic Party is
the evil party, the Republican Party is the  stupid party. Really stupid,
ridiculously stupid.
.
.
This brings us to Donald  Trump.
.
What most characterizes Trump is how poorly  informed he is about any issues
that deal with religion  -any religion. He  is utterly clueless. Which has 
never
been excusable in the past  -McCain was  equally  clueless, Romney was 
clueless except insofar as he understands Mormon  doctrine.  George W. Bush
spoke 'Evangelize' and didn't seem to understand  any other form of 
spiritual
language. As for the Democrats, the situation  has been hopeless since the
time of Lyndon Baines Johnson. Hillary's husband  seemed to comprehend some 
of what religion is all about but, to be kind,  that much was precious 
little.
To put it in academic terms, he managed not to  flunk Religion 101 in 
college
but that was his outer limit. As for Barack  Hussein, it is difficult to 
imagine
a worse mess.
 
He understands absolutely nothing. He doesn't  even grasp the basics of 
Islam,
the one faith tradition about which he 'knows'  (put the word in 2 point 
type)
a little about. The problem has been his  'education' in Subud, a type of
shamanistic version of Sufism known in Indonesia  and virtually nowhere else
even though there are a handful of  believers in the US. This is a religion 
akin to
Theosophy or, vaguely, the Baha'i Faith, but one  that is mixed in with
mystical mumbo jumbo and a dose of more orthodox  Islam, but not all 
that much,  which in accepting most  religions on Earth as more-or-less
valid in their own imperfect ways, understands  just about  nothing of
substance, hence imagining that maybe 2/3rds of  core Muslim beliefs
simply do not exist. Hence Obama can  present Muhammad's religion as
almost anything he wants it to be to suit his  political needs.
.
Trump is even worse, not because he believes  in  a bizarre theology but 
because
he doesn't know what theology is, what religion  is either, and  -which 
became
painfully obvious some months ago-   has never studied anything at all 
about 
any religion. None of which stops him from  having as many opinions on
religious subjects as he  desires.
.
Trump doesn't seem to have taken any religion  seriously  -ever. And he is 
now
the presumptive Republican nominee for President  of the United States ?
.
Hence he is oblivious to even the most basic  difficulties in choosing what
political positions to take, certainly  considering the fact that maybe 
half of
the votes he needs to win the general election  must come from 
religious-minded
voters. To cite one example, while his  opposition to Islam fits quite well 
with 
Evangelical values, that he joins this  to enthusiastic support for the e
ntire
homosexual agenda is a world class contradiction  guaranteed to anger
or dismay, say, 50 million conservative voters.  That is, because of his
monumental ignorance he is tone deaf to possibly  all such questions
where religion and politics  intersect.
 
But where on the political Right are there  responsible critics who can make
the kinds of  points that need to be  made  -that needed to be made long 
before
Trump began to run away with the field and win  one primary election after
another, demolishing his opponents  piecemeal?  There isn't anyone like that
in the entire Republican Party. This may not  matter all that much among
Democrats, many of whom are de facto  Atheists or no better than nominal
religious believers, but it matters greatly on  the Right. However, nearly 
all
GOP leadership for all factions of the party is resolutely  secular and 
uneducated 
to any kind of faith tradition except, in cases, their  own religion. 
.
But if that is all you know you can see the  problem. Either you will 
interpret
all religions, at least at their best, as  inferior versions of your own  
religion,
as good even if not as good as your faith, OR as  totally bad, misguided,
worthless, and malignant. Hence all sorts of  absurdities like anti-Muslim
zealots who attack Sikhs, who are not Muslims,  as if they were, simply
because they wear turbans. More germane are  politicians who refuse to
make themselves informed about Islam and insist,  over and over, that 
Muhammad's religion is essentially peaceful and  otherwise little different
than Christianity. That is all they know, after  all. They are incapable
of making even elementary distinctions and their  knowledge base 
about religion is approximately  zero.
.
On the Left the situation is no better  -it  is merely based on a different 
mythology. Basically this love and flowers worldview is a  latter-day 
manifestation of secularized  Theosophy of the period from  the late 
19th century until the 1920s. It is a fairly  tale.
.
It is also pre-Freudian, with no psychological  depth, and it is 
pre-Darwinian,
with no understanding of such phenomena as  predation and its effects, not 
just
animal predation but attacks of one culture upon  another, and sometimes 
ideological predation as one set of ideas seeks to overwhelm  another.
All of this is war  - wars of ideas and  wars of values. What there is 
precious 
little of is "peace, love, and understanding"  borne along by noble souls 
who 
have the values of Franciscan or Buddhist monks.  Which is to say that,
yes, there are monks in history, and even eras  when national populations
sought peace above all else, but these periods  never last. They end and
are replaced by fierce competition  -which  is the norm for most of the long
chapters of human history. 
.
In so many words, some religions are more  adaptive than others, some better
provisioned with useful ideas, some are far more  realistic, and  some are 
more
"Protestant" in Weber's sense, more conducive to  something we would call
progress. But even here caution in making  judgements is called for. Some 
perfectly good religions are effectively  destroyed by others  -the ancient
religion of  Mesopotamia, for instance,  Isisism in Egypt and the 
Mediterranean,
Druidism in the British Isles, and Zoroastrianism  which, while it still is 
with us
and sometimes finds new life in the ideas of  creative individuals, has been
reduced to a small fraction of what it once was.  The Left totally ignores
all of this history as if none of it mattered,  as if the story of the 
deaths
of religions tell us  nothing.
.
The Left, when it comes to religion, is  approximately as ignorant as the 
Right.
Its knowledge of the facts of the history of  religions is pure mythology, 
on 
the order of the kinds of mythological systems  that gave us the story arcs
we are familiar with from the each testament of  the Bible. There are truths
in such mythological constructions,  but:
(1) you are in no position to make use of those  truths unless you are 
convincingly aware that these are  systems of myths, and
(2) there are large areas of tradition that are  downright false to
the facts that need to be recognized for what  they are.
.
The Religious Left thinks it has all the  answers, that the Right is 
hopelessly
benighted, and that 'liberal' values are  unarguable, hence opposition 
should
be shut up or drowned out in opprobrium.  Actually, however, the worldview
of the Left is just as, shall we say, out to  lunch. And it can never not be
out to lunch as long as it draws its inspiration  from simple-minded ultra
idealists like Karen Armstrong who seek to  reduce all faiths to a lovely 
mush
which is founded on fundamental dishonesty. For  he fact is that the 
differences
between religions matter just as much as the  similarities. Can any fact
about religion be more  obvious?
.
I mean, if a choice must be made between the  anti-scientific evolution 
views
of the Right vs the anti-sociobiology  anti-evolution views of the 
(feminist inspired)
Left,  I would choose the science and the  sociobiology every time. In 
religion
as in politics my philosophy is Radical Centrist  in nature and what use are
all orthodoxies that no longer make sense  in the 21st century? Some very 
ancient orthodoxies do stand the test of time,  however, and these deserve
to be cherished for the treasures they  are.
.
All of which, it is certain, sails  completely over the head of Donald 
Trump.
Not only him, of course, but he is poised to  become the nominee of the
Republican Party. Therefore he is  everyone's problem,
.
And the situation of the Democratic Party is  even worse.
.
This does not say that Trump is wrong about all  issues. On the contrary
he is right about a number of matters that  count the most. He is right,
for instance, that Islam is anti-homosexual,  anti-woman, and anti-Jewish.
But Trump is right for all the wrong  reasons.
 
And there is a very large dilemma involved in  the issue of Islam:  That  
religion
is right to be opposed to homosexuality even if  Muslims have no idea why
they are right on this issue. But, to say the  least, the way they go about
in their opposition is reprehensible in the  extreme and unacceptable
to civilized human  beings.
.
Trump has said:  "We  need to tell the truth about radical Islam and we 
need 
to do it now." Clearly this kind of  outspokenness has done much to win him
his status as the presumptive nominee of the  GOP, for the party leadership
consists, for the most part, of "soft"  politically correct wimps  -not as 
bad
as Democrats but substantively little different.  Millions of Americans
are sick and tired of being lied to about   Islam and Mr. Trump is the
beneficiary of this public  outrage.
.
"We need to tell the truth also when how radical  Islam is coming to our 
shores,"
he added, as intrinsic to the multitudes of  immigrants from Muslim 
countries 
bringing it with them. This is the simple truth. But is Mr.  Trump prepared 
to deal
with the uproar his policies are sure  to set in motion?   How this might be
possible for someone who is so poorly prepared  is a question that can only
be answered in the negative. He has no idea what  the implications of his
policies could lead to in terms of events in the  real world. What is needed
to succeed is a general of ideas; Trump is no better than a corporal
in the intellectual realm, and that is also the  truth.
.
If you see innuendo here, you got the  meaning, exactly.
.
Neil Stevens, in an article posted at Red  State on June 13, 2016, has said 
it best
of anyone so  far:
.
"Donald Trump is as clueless on Islamic terror as Hillary Clinton."
And this is only the beginning of the necessary critique.
.
Here is what Hillary said on November 19, 2015:   "Let’s be clear: Islam is 
not 
our adversary. Muslims are peaceful and tolerant people and have nothing 
whatsoever to do with terrorism." As Stevens put it: "To  claim that 
terrorism 
has nothing to do with Islam, is fantasy." 
.
For example, there are about 120 jihad verses in the Koran, depending on 
how you count. Of this number about 50 teach the virtues of inner struggle, 
of working out one's ideas, and so forth.  However, the other 70  verses
are the exact opposite and preach extreme violence including  crucifixion
of prisoners, enslavement of captives, and forceful conversion of  people
at the point of the sword. The worst case of this policy was the  thousand
years of jihad against India, from roughly 1000 AD until the mid 20th  
century,
indeed, up to the carnage and horrific property damage at Mumbai  (Bombay)
in November of 2008. In this period of time an estimated 70 million Hindus 
and Buddhists were slaughtered, another 70 or 80  million  enslaved, and
literally thousands of temples destroyed  -or confiscated to become  
mosques.
Which does not count the destruction of probably the leading  institution
of higher education in the world at the time, the famed Buddhist  school,
Nalanda University, and its vast library. Several hundred peaceful 
Buddhist monks were burned to death during this atrocity.
.
To be sure, MINOs, Muslims In Name Only, are usually little different  than
anyone else morally. The problem arises when they actually believe  what 
the 
Koran teaches and what Islam stands for more generally. Some figures say 
that of all religious believers on earth, Muslims are the least well  
informed 
about their professed religion than anyone else. But what happens  when
they do become informed  -as seems to be happening more and  more,
everywhere? The mass killings at a homosexual nightclub in Orlando
give you one example. Maybe you can recall others.
 
.
.
Billy Rojas
(continued, Part 2,  following)

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to