Ernie:
You say that I will be surprised in 2020? But in what way is that a
political strategy?  Sounds a lot like Daniel Pipes to me.
 
To be sure,  2020 could be a very good year, maybe a terrific year. 
Maybe all the stars will line up "just right." Maybe there will be a great 
candidate for president whom the multitudes can finally rally around, 
the best conceivable choice. OK.
 
Let's grant all of your hopes and regard them as a package and a "done  
deal."
 
Here's what's wrong with that picture:  There are  four years between now 
and then. The damages that either Hillary or Trump can cause "in the  
meantime"
could be enormous. The reason why I eventually voted for Romney  despite
serious misgivings was because of what Obama could do "in the  meantime."
Those damages have been horrific.
 
Romney was wooden, uninspiring, a true stuffed shirt, out of touch  with
normal Americans, and all of that,  but he would not have torn  down
the country to implement his policies. You knew he would exercise
necessary caution when he should and not compromise away what  is
most important about America. He wasn't imaginative, he lacked  boldness,
he was excessively risk averse, but he was no fool.
 
What we got with Obama, after his first four years turned out as  badly
as they did, was a pro-Muslim Leftist whose interests lay with every 
pathological interest group in the country, from Al Sharpton's  followers
to feminist crazies to the ranks of the perverted, and even more.
His foreign policy was a disaster, his domestic policy was basically
a joke,  he was incompetent at nearly everything he did. As much  as
I detested Bush Jr., from the vantage of 2009 - 2016 the "W" years
were a golden age in retrospect. Which tells you how bad Obama
really has been. And now we are supposed to passively await
the tender mercies of Hillary or Trump and do nothing?
 
I think I understand where you are coming from. For sure, what I  actually
know about your "off camera" life is limited, but some things are clear  
enough.
Your sense of values has come across loud and clear. You want peace
at any price, that is the bottom line.
 
Peace is hardly a bad thing, of course. Indeed, it is a very good  thing.
And the sentiment is shared by millions of people. But we live in  dangerous
times and wishful thinking does not make it less dangerous.
 
Your value system also overlaps with that of many other Evangelicals.
To be sure, it would be an overgeneralization for me to put you
in the category "Evangelical voter" and say no more. There are plenty
of exceptions to that rule in your life. Still, the commonalities do  exist
and mean something. 
 
There are different types of political personalities. Both Left and  Right
there are those people who prefer to fight guns with flowers. There  also
are those who reduce all issues to economics, both Left and Right.
And there are those, Left, Right, and Other, who prefer to march 
with pitchforks by day and with lighted torches by night. And  that
more-or-less is the category you will find me in.
 
I love a good fight  -a good political fight. For me, and I think  for most 
of
the "political class,"  politics is war by other means. I not  only  accept 
this
truism (so it seems to me) I think it is a good thing. As "peaceful" as  
politics
gets by this model is when it temporarily becomes courtroom drama
-which, of course, still is adversarial. That's OK with me.
But the fighting part is what I thrive on.
 
The "peaceful solutions" approach is exactly what is best for  families;
the most successful families fight as little as possible and seek to  live
love-centered lives. And fights among friends are 99. 9 % a bad idea.
As well, when it comes to governance, it is far better to seek 
peaceful outcomes that bring people together.
 
However, politics is not governance, it is a substitute for  revolution.
As such it has a different character altogether. It requires  fighting.
just as does, say, the sport of boxing or wrestling or, for that  matter,
football or hockey. Governance is more like baseball or basketball.
or maybe gymnastics. Fierce competition in either case but politics
is a different animal and people do get hurt in it. But you know this
when you sign up  -or should know this.
 
What  has been my experience is that Evangelicals are loathe to  cultivate
"fighting skills" when it comes to politics. They may show great  courage
and even willingness to make martyrs of themselves for a worthy  cause,
but marital skills are not in the picture. Some exceptions, Ralph  Reed
comes to mind,  but  he is a perfect example of someone for  whom
this is all a "second language" and who, accordingly, "doesn't get" 
any number of things. 
 
He also has what I consider to be a characteristic weakness of the  
Evangelical
position in the political arena, the view that as long as there is  progress
against abortion everything else can slide. That is very far, indeed,  from
my philosophy of politics even if I also would like to see progress  made
in limiting abortions. But that issue is not a priority for me, you  already
know my priorities, and in my view those other issues matter far more
politically because of everything that is implied.
 
The abortion issue for the Left is secondary in a different sense, a  sense
that the Religious Right does not fathom. The Right is like the Byzantine  
Empire,
willing to sacrifice Manzikert, then Smyrna, then Antioch, even  Athens,
as long as they can defend Constantinople. But in the end, with  everything
else sacrificed  -or put off for another time-  even  Constantinople fell
to the Saracens. That is how it looks to me.
 
Plus the Byzantines hobbled themselves by their unwillingness to make
common cause with Rome. Offers of alliance with "heretics" were
unacceptable on principle and so they had no allies.
 
Whether or not this historical sketch is 100% accurate is not the  issue.
The issue is this model of events as a formula for political failure.
 
And I think this is where America has gotten.
 
 
Billy
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
  • [RC] 20... BILROJ via Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community
    • Re... Dr. Ernie Prabhakar

Reply via email to