There is one question:  What about non-religious  people?
How do these findings explain actual Atheists, or, maybe more  germane,
what does it say about those who are disinterested in religion?
 
There's also a corollary:  Not everyone is  as  religious. Some people
are true believers and others are not, and there seem to be degrees
of commitment. Is there some kind of overall theory to account 
for these kinds of differences?
 
Anyway, a fascinating study.
 
BR
 
 
 
The neuroscience argument that religion shaped the very structure of  our 
brains
Olivia Goldhill ("Quartz," December 3, 2016) 
Religion and neuroscience are not an obvious pairing. But earlier this  
week, a study published in Social Neuroscience demonstrated that spiritual  
feelings activate the neurological reward systems of devout Mormons. The study  
used fMRI scans to show that the nucleus accumbens—an area associated with  
reward—is activated when Mormons who have a strong sense of spirituality 
carry  out religious activities. The same area can also be activated by love, 
sex,  drugs, and music. 
In  this particular paper, the study, with a sample size of just 19, has 
serious  limitations. But it’s part of a young and fast-growing new field that 
examines  the relationship between our brains and religion, called 
neurotheology. 
Jordan  Grafman, head of the cognitive neuroscience laboratory at 
Rehabilitation  Institute of Chicago and neurology professor at Northwestern 
University, says  that neurotheology is important in part because early 
religious 
practices helped  develop our brains to begin with. “Religion has played an 
incredibly important  role in human evolution. It’s funny, people want to 
separate the two but in fact  they’re intertwined,” he says. 
Of  course, it’s a two-way relationship between the brain and religion. Our 
brains  had to develop the capacity to establish social communities and 
behaviors, which  are the basis of religious societies. But religious practice 
in turn developed  the brain, says Grafman. “As these societies became more 
co-operative, our  brains evolved in response to that. Our brain led to 
behavior and then the  behavior fed back to our brain to help sculpt it,” he 
adds. 
For  example, frontal lobes are necessary to future planning and 
controlling  compulsive behavior, and therefore to the social arrangements 
within 
organized  religion. But consistently practicing religious social behaviors 
likely  strengthened those areas of the brain: “If we end up using more of one 
region,  it will try to take up greater shape. It will expand a little bit. 
That’s no  doubt what happened to the frontal lobes,” says Grafman. 
But  there’s no part of the brain, nor neurological response, that’s 
distinctly  religious. Andrew Newberg, a neurotheologian and professor of 
emergency medicine  and radiology at Thomas Jefferson University was one of the 
first to study the  connection between neurology and religion, in the 1990s. 
Back then, his work was  highly unusual, but he says the field has grown 
massively in the past 10 to 15  years. Newberg’s work has identified key 
neurological responses to spiritual  experience, but he points out that the 
field “
is about understanding ourselves  as human beings,” not simply in connection 
with religion. 
“No  specific part of the brain is the religious self,” he says. “Many 
parts of the  brain are part of our religious and spiritual practices. I think 
that makes  sense because religious beliefs involves our thoughts, actions, 
and  behaviors.” 
Studies  suggest that the reward system activated in the Mormon study would 
also be  activated whenever subject experience an equivalent secular 
experience: for  example, when a subject reads an opinion—whether it’s 
political, 
scientific,  legal, or any other field—with which they strongly agree. “We’
ve seen it with  political beliefs, donating to charities they believed in—
after all, that’s why  we repeat our behaviors,” says Grafman. 
“What  makes religious studies interesting is they’re uniquely human 
traits and belief  systems. If you do find a set of brain areas that are active 
during a religious  task, by reverse inference you can make a judgment about 
what cognitive  processes—social or emotional—underlie that particular 
activation that’s there  in the religious task,” he says. If you ask people to 
think about God, for  example, the brain areas that activate turn out to be 
the same as brain areas  activated in empathetic tasks, like imagining a 
situation from someone else’s  perspective. 
Some  academics resist certain neurotheology practices, arguing that 
religion is far  too nuanced and subtle an experience to study using brain 
scans. 
Evan Thompson,  philosophy of mind professor at the University of British 
Columbia, says that  studies such as the recent Mormon paper are simply too 
blunt. “The brain has to  be understood as a complex series of networks in 
which the meaning of anything  going on in it is always dependent on the 
context,” he says. “When we study the  brain, we’re interested in how it 
enables 
human cognition generally. And if we  want to understand religion, we need 
something like anthropology.” 
Some  work in neurotheology does work to incorporate anthropology, and 
researchers say  that neuroscience is, at the very least, a crucial area of 
study within the  larger conversation around understanding religion. “There’s 
the argument that  religion has benefited human beings by helping to create 
cohesive societies and  morals and help us to determine our behavior and 
interact with the world more  effectively,” says Newberg. “The ability to think 
about this from a neuroscience  perspective is part of that discussion.” 
As  Grafman points out, the history of every human society involves 
religion.  “There’s nobody who’d say it’s not important,” he says. “It’s just 
been  understudied from a neuroscience point of  view.

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to