Mind boggling. Thanks for sharing. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 1, 2018, at 17:05, Chris Hahn <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Great article Billy.  I forwarded it to my pastor.
> Chris
>  
> From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On 
> Behalf Of Billy Rojas
> Sent: Sunday, April 1, 2018 9:27 AM
> To: Centroids Discussions <[email protected]>
> Cc: Billy Rojas <[email protected]>
> Subject: [RC] Wall Street Journal -article about Easter
>  
>  
> 
> Wall Street Journal
> 
> The Easter Effect and How It Changed the World
> 
> The first Christians were baffled by what they called ‘the Resurrection.’ 
> Their struggle to understand it brought about astonishing success for their 
> faith
> 
>  
>  
> 
> ‘Resurrection of Christ’ by Sodoma (Giovanni Antonio Bazzi). PHOTO: BRIDGEMAN 
> IMAGES
> 
> By 
> George Weigel
> March 30, 2018 10:05 a.m. ET
> 578 COMMENTS
>  
> In the year 312, just before his victory at the Battle of the Milvian Bridge 
> won him the undisputed leadership of the Roman Empire, Constantine the Great 
> had a heavenly vision of Christian symbols. That augury led him, a year 
> later, to end all legal sanctions on the public profession of Christianity.
> Or so a pious tradition has it.
> 
> But there’s a more mundane explanation for Constantine’s decision: He was a 
> politician who had shrewdly decided to join the winning side. By the early 
> 4th century, Christians likely counted for between a quarter and a half of 
> the population of the Roman Empire, and their exponential growth seemed 
> likely to continue.
> How did this happen? How did a ragtag band of nobodies from the far edges of 
> the Mediterranean world become such a dominant force in just two and a half 
> centuries? The historical sociology of this extraordinary phenomenon has been 
> explored by Rodney Stark of Baylor University, who argues that Christianity 
> modeled a nobler way of life than what was on offer elsewhere in the rather 
> brutal society of the day. In Christianity, women were respected as they 
> weren’t in classical culture and played a critical role in bringing men to 
> the faith and attracting converts. In an age of plagues, the readiness of 
> Christians to care for all the sick, not just their own, was a factor, as was 
> the impressive witness to faith of countless martyrs. Christianity also grew 
> from within because Christians had larger families, a byproduct of their 
> faith’s prohibition of contraception, abortion and infanticide.
> 
> For theologians who like to think that arguments won the day for the 
> Christian faith, this sort of historical reconstruction is not particularly 
> gratifying, but it makes a lot of human sense. Prof. Stark’s analysis still 
> leaves us with a question, though: How did all that modeling of a compelling, 
> alternative way of life get started? And that, in turn, brings us back to 
> that gaggle of nobodies in the early first century A.D. and what happened to 
> them.
> 
> What happened to them was the Easter Effect.
> 
> There is no accounting for the rise of Christianity without weighing the 
> revolutionary effect on those nobodies of what they called “the 
> Resurrection”: their encounter with the one whom they embraced as the Risen 
> Lord, whom they first knew as the itinerant Jewish rabbi, Jesus of Nazareth, 
> and who died an agonizing and shameful death on a Roman cross outside 
> Jerusalem. As N.T. Wright, one of the Anglosphere’s pre-eminent biblical 
> scholars, makes clear, that first generation answered the question of why 
> they were Christians with a straightforward answer: because Jesus was raised 
> from the dead.
> 
> Now that, as some disgruntled listeners once complained about Jesus’ 
> preaching, is “a hard saying.” It was no less challenging two millennia ago 
> than it is today. And one of the most striking things about the New Testament 
> accounts of Easter, and what followed in the days immediately after Easter, 
> is that the Gospel writers and editors carefully preserved the memory of the 
> first Christians’ bafflement, skepticism and even fright about what had 
> happened to their former teacher and what was happening to them.
> 
> 
> ‘The Incredulity of St. Thomas’ by Caravaggio. PHOTO: BRIDGEMAN IMAGES
> 
> In Mark’s gospel, Mary Magdalene and other women in Jesus’ entourage find his 
> tomb empty and a young man sitting nearby telling them that “Jesus of 
> Nazareth, who was crucified…has risen; he is not here.” But they had no idea 
> what that was all about, “and went out and fled from the tomb…[and] said 
> nothing to anyone, for they were afraid.”
> 
> Two disciples walking to Emmaus from Jerusalem on Easter afternoon haven’t a 
> clue as to who’s talking with them along their way, interpreting the 
> scriptures and explaining Jesus’ suffering as part of his messianic mission. 
> They don’t even recognize who it is that sits down to supper with them until 
> he breaks bread and asks a blessing: “…and their eyes were opened and they 
> recognized him.” They high-tail it back to Jerusalem to tell the other 
> friends of Jesus, who report that Peter has had a similarly strange 
> experience, but when “Jesus himself stood among them…they were startled and 
> frightened, and supposed that they saw a ghost.”
> Some time later, Peter, John and others in Jesus’ core group are fishing on 
> the Sea of Tiberias. “Jesus stood on the beach,” we are told, “yet the 
> disciples did not know that it was Jesus.” At the very end of these 
> post-Easter accounts, those whom we might expect to have been the first to 
> grasp what was afoot are still skeptical. When that core group of Jesus’ 
> followers goes back to Galilee, they see him, “but some doubted.”
> 
> This remarkable and deliberate recording of the first Christians’ 
> incomprehension of what they insisted was the irreducible bottom line of 
> their faith teaches us two things. First, it tells us that the early 
> Christians were confident enough about what they called the Resurrection that 
> (to borrow from Prof. Wright) they were prepared to say something like, “I 
> know this sounds ridiculous, but it’s what happened.” And the second thing it 
> tells us is that it took time for the first Christians to figure out what the 
> events of Easter meant
> —not only for Jesus but for themselves. As they worked that out, their 
> thinking about a lot of things changed profoundly, as Prof. Wright and Pope 
> Emeritus Benedict XVI help us to understand in their biblical commentaries.
> ‘The Easter Effect impelled them to bring a new standard of equality into the 
> world.’
> The way they thought about time and history changed. During Jesus’ public 
> ministry, many of his followers shared in the Jewish messianic expectations 
> of the time: God would soon work something grand for his people in Israel, 
> liberating them from their oppressors and bringing about a new age in which 
> (as Isaiah had prophesied) the nations would stream to the mountain of the 
> Lord and history would end. The early Christians came to understand that the 
> cataclysmic, world-redeeming act that God had promised had taken place at 
> Easter. God’s Kingdom had come not at the end of time but within time—and 
> that had changed the texture of both time and history. History continued, but 
> those shaped by the Easter Effect became the people who knew how history was 
> going to turn out. Because of that, they could live differently. The Easter 
> Effect impelled them to bring a new standard of equality into the world and 
> to embrace death as martyrs if necessary—because they knew, now, that death 
> did not have the final word in the human story.
>  
> The way they thought about “resurrection” changed. Pious Jews taught by the 
> reforming Pharisees of Jesus’ time believed in the resurrection of the dead. 
> Easter taught the first Christians, who were all pious Jews, that this 
> resurrection was not the resuscitation of a corpse, nor did it involve the 
> decomposition of a corpse. Jesus’ tomb was empty, but the Risen Lord appeared 
> to his disciples in a transformed body. Those who first experienced the 
> Easter Effect would not have put it in these terms, but as their 
> understanding of what had happened to Jesus and to themselves grew, they 
> grasped that (as Benedict XVI put it in “Jesus of Nazareth–Holy Week”) there 
> had been an “evolutionary leap” in the human condition. A new way of being 
> had been encountered in the manifestly human but utterly different life of 
> the one they met as the Risen Lord. That insight radically changed all those 
> who embraced it.
> 
> Which brings us to the next manifestation of the Easter Effect among the 
> first Christians: The way they thought about their responsibilities changed. 
> What had happened to Jesus, they slowly began to grasp, was not just about 
> their former teacher and friend; it was about all of them. His destiny was 
> their destiny. So not only could they face opposition, scorn and even death 
> with confidence; they could offer to others the truth and the fellowship they 
> had been given. Indeed, they had to do so, to be faithful to what they had 
> experienced. Christian mission is inconceivable without Easter. And that 
> mission would eventually lead these sons and daughters of Abraham to the 
> conviction that the promise that God had made to the People of Israel had 
> been extended to those who were not sons and daughters of Abraham. Because of 
> Easter, the gentiles, too, could be embraced in a relationship—a 
> covenant—with the one God, which was embodied in righteous living.
> 
> 
> Pakistani Christian worshipers during an Easter Mass in Lahore, 2015. 
> PHOTO:LIGHTROCKET/GETTY IMAGES
> 
> The way they thought about worship and its temporal rhythms changed. For the 
> Jews who were the first members of the Jesus movement, nothing was more 
> sacrosanct than the Sabbath, the seventh day of rest and worship. The Sabbath 
> was enshrined in creation, for God himself had rested on the seventh day. The 
> Sabbath’s importance as a key behavioral marker of the People of God had been 
> reaffirmed in the Ten Commandments. Yet these first Christians, all Jews, 
> quickly fixed Sunday as the “Lord’s Day,” because Easter had been a Sunday. 
> Benedict XVI draws out the crucial point here:
> “Only an event that marked souls indelibly could bring about such a profound 
> realignment of the religious culture of the week. Mere theological 
> speculations could not have achieved this... [The] celebration of the Lord’s 
> day, which was characteristic of the Christian community from the outset, is 
> one of the most convincing proofs that something extraordinary happened [at 
> Easter]—the discovery of the empty tomb and the encounter with the Risen 
> Lord.”
>  
> Without the Easter Effect, there is really no explaining why there was a 
> winning side—the Christian side—for Constantine the Great to choose. That 
> effect, as Prof. Wright puts it, begins with, and is incomprehensible 
> without, the first Christians’ conviction that “Jesus of Nazareth was raised 
> bodily to a new sort of life, three days after his execution.” Recognizing 
> that does not, of course, convince everyone. Nor does it end the mystery of 
> Easter. The first Christians, like Christians today, cannot fully comprehend 
> resurrected life: the life depicted in the Gospels of a transphysical body 
> that can eat, drink and be touched but that also appears and disappears, 
> unbothered by obstacles like doors and distance.
> 
> Nor does Easter mean that everything is always going to turn out just fine, 
> for there is still work to be done in history. As Benedict XVI put it in his 
> 2010 Easter message: “Easter does not work magic. Just as the Israelites 
> found the desert awaiting them on the far side of the Red Sea, so the Church, 
> after the Resurrection, always finds history filled with joy and hope, grief 
> and anguish. And yet this history is changed…it is truly open to the future.”
> Which perhaps offers one final insight into the question with which we began: 
> How did the Jesus movement, beginning on the margins of civilization and led 
> by people of seeming inconsequence, end up being what Constantine regarded as 
> the winning side? However important the role of sociological factors in 
> explaining why Christianity carried the day, there also was that curious and 
> inexplicable joy that marked the early Christians, even as they were being 
> marched off to execution. Was that joy simply delusion? Denial?
> 
> Perhaps it was the Easter Effect: the joy of people who had become convinced 
> that they were witnesses to something inexplicable but nonetheless true. 
> Something that gave a superabundance of meaning to life and that erased the 
> fear of death. Something that had to be shared. Something with which to 
> change the world.
> 
> Mr. Weigel is distinguished senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy 
> Center, where he holds the William E. Simon Chair in Catholic Studies.
>  
> -- 
> -- 
> Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
> <[email protected]>
> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
> Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
> 
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> -- 
> -- 
> Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
> <[email protected]>
> Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
> Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org
> 
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to