Ernie:

There also is football practice.


I don't know about the "peaceful non-debate format, how much  interest and

enthusiasm does it really generate?   Seems to me it would be low even if

some people would like it to be serene and fascinating.


I know what works, and works well, even when there is no clash of views in 
debate format.


Architectural students from high school and up have juried contests to determine

the best home designs. Usually a student builds a model of a house.  Sometimes

a good size crowd attends  -to see all the new designs. And this can be

fascinating and very pleasing to look  at.

But I don't know how this can be done without visuals. And how are you going to 
get
decent visuals without training in the arts?  The black astronaut had it right,
STEM needs to be expanded to STEAM.

Sure, some people are dismissive of the arts, but all you need to do is take 
one look
at an art project put together by a non artist and it is obvious that he or she
has no idea what to do.  And isn't is odd that in an age of visuals,   -TV, 
film, websites,
animations, high intensity video games, advertising, sophisticated 
merchandising,
fashion design, etc.-    that art training is regarded as unnecessary
and dispensable from schools?


In the Victorian era everyone learned basics of art.  I'd say that we need the 
same thing
for our time in history.


Billy



PS  There also is music practice.  "What are you doing?"   "I'm practicing one 
of
Bach's unaccompanied flute sonatas."



________________________________
From: Centroids <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 2:28 PM
To: Centroids Discussions; Billy Rojas
Subject: Public Philosophy anti-debate

With high schoolers!
https://medium.com/@davidovich/how-to-spend-a-saturday-watching-the-next-generation-learn-to-listen-discuss-and-reason-ef801eb42c2b
[https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1200/1*rUpIy1BVpD8RbsDqy9ucUg.jpeg]<https://medium.com/@davidovich/how-to-spend-a-saturday-watching-the-next-generation-learn-to-listen-discuss-and-reason-ef801eb42c2b>

How to Spend a Saturday Watching the Next Generation Learn to Listen, Discuss 
and 
Reason<https://medium.com/@davidovich/how-to-spend-a-saturday-watching-the-next-generation-learn-to-listen-discuss-and-reason-ef801eb42c2b>
medium.com
If you’ve ever watched a teenager, alone or with friends, sit and stare at a 
smart phone for hours, you probably worried that they were tuning out the 
world. In mid-January, I volunteered to serve as…



How to Spend a Saturday Watching the Next Generation Learn to Listen, Discuss 
and Reason
davidovich<https://medium.com/@davidovich?source=post_header_lockup>Jan 29

If you’ve ever watched a teenager, alone or with friends, sit and stare at a 
smart phone for hours, you probably worried that they were tuning out the world.

It’s a legitimate concern, but I’ve recently seen a very different future for 
today’s young adults.

In mid-January, I volunteered to serve as a judge for Northern California 
Regional High School Ethics Bowl at the University of California, Santa Cruz. I 
went into the event with only a vague idea of the intention: I assumed it was 
like a debating club in high school, though I had been advised that it was 
something quite different. I assumed it would be a lot like our classrooms 
discussions when I was in college years ago.

What I discovered was certainly not what I had expected.

First, picture the campus of UC Santa Cruz, deep in the redwood forest 
overlooking the Pacific Ocean, a couple of hours from San Francisco. It’s over 
the Coastal mountain range from Silicon Valley, and yet stands a world apart in 
many ways.

[https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1600/1*qk9WhO2d4N7HwL-OD1KGAQ.png]&amp;lt;img
 class="progressiveMedia-noscript js-progressiveMedia-inner" 
src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1600/1*qk9WhO2d4N7HwL-OD1KGAQ.png"&amp;gt;
A back trail at the University of California, Santa Cruz with a view of the 
Pacific Ocean.

The setting is serene and cool, especially on a January morning.

The 2018 Regional High School Ethics Bowl took place on the campus of Cowell 
College, the first of the ten colleges, in the Humanities Building.

[https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1600/1*rUpIy1BVpD8RbsDqy9ucUg.jpeg]&amp;lt;img
 class="progressiveMedia-noscript js-progressiveMedia-inner" 
src="https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1600/1*rUpIy1BVpD8RbsDqy9ucUg.jpeg"&amp;gt;
The Humanities Building, Cowell College, UC Santa Cruz.

The judges assembled a 8 am for a quick introduction; it turned out most of us 
were first timers, but there were veterans present to guide us through the 
judging process. Then the students arrived in time for a 9 am start time. I 
expected them to be typically raucous teenagers. Instead, they were pretty 
quiet and serious — smiling and laughing a bit, but mostly preparing themselves 
mentally for the challenge, and the opportunity, that was about to begin.

What is an “Ethics Bowl?”

The High School Ethics Bowl activity is, in principle, quite simple: teams of 4 
or 5 students from local high schools compete against other teams in a series 
of discussions — not debates — on several particularly timely and often thorny 
ethical questions.

As in a debate, team A presents the case, the team B responds, then team A has 
a final say. Judges listen without comment throughout these phases, then get to 
ask questions of team A, with the intention of exploring their thought 
processes and how they determined their positions. Judges score each phase of 
the process, based on predetermined criteria and point allocations. The winner 
is the team with the most points.

So, what’s the objective of an Ethics Bowl? And how is it different from a 
standard debate?

Simply stated, the objective is to encourage the participants to examine 
difficult social questions, not from the perspective of how to win an argument, 
but rather how to find the right solution based on ethical criteria.

Sounds simple, right? Actually, it can be quite challenging to do this 
according to the rules; you have to leave a lot of your preconceived notions, 
preferences and biases outside the room. You have to engage, listen and explain 
without reverting to the social conditioning and judgments that most of us 
carry with us.

Participants are given a set of questions to review in advance; on the day of 
the Ethics Bowl, the event moderator for each session distributes a pre-elected 
single topic for the two teams to discuss. When the session ends, the teams 
move on to other rooms and engage with other teams. Each new session has a new 
question, and that continues throughout the day.

What I Saw and Heard

In our group, the teams were given questions on whether smokers have rights in 
the workplace, legal responsibilities involving driverless cars, and whether 
pit bulls should be regulated. In each case, team A presented the assigned 
issue as best they could, team B responded with questions and challenges, and 
team A then responded to those points.

I participated in three sessions. I only observed the first, to learn the 
dynamics and see how the two teams presented. I was then an active judge in the 
second and third round.

In one session, an intense young man with a shock of wavy hair spoke in an 
impassioned manner about the need for fairness, regardless of gender, race or 
appearance. He was particularly concerned about women being objectified.

Another challenged the notion that dogs can be regulated by breed: “dogs should 
be allowed to live meaningful lives,” as loyal and loved companions.

A young woman, who was clearly experienced in debate, succinctly articulated 
the position her team was required to argue, and added her personal values as 
supporting evidence. She was then directly challenged by the other team who 
were not as experienced; they were initially shy and hesitant, but eventually 
found their voices, and presented and countered with intensity.

Most were well prepared with some background in the principles of the common 
good, individual liberties and social responsibility. I remembered my 
discussions in college, long ago, and I wondered if we were in any way as able 
to identify an argument, present it without prejudice, and listen closely to 
the replies. I suspect we were not in their league.

What Students Learn by Participating

What surprised me the most was that these high schoolers — mostly 16 and 17 
years old — love the process of engaging with others. Since an Ethics Bowl is 
not adversarial, yet competitive, it seemed to energize the participants to 
think hard, clearly explain their thoughts and feelings, and find ways to 
communicate without manipulation or artifice. There was no distraction of cell 
phones or text messages; they were fully engaged and participating with all 
their energy and attention.

I heard students say that they appreciated the non-competitive nature of the 
event. Some seemed to struggle to express themselves, but would suddenly have 
an insight, or find a phrase, and their demeanor would quickly change from 
doubt to self confidence. The excitement, wonder and energy that I saw on those 
young faces was simply amazing to me. It was inspiring to observe and 
participate.

I loved asking them questions that I assumed they had not though about; 
sometimes, it turned out they had given these topics a lot more thought than I 
had. That was a bit of a shock! I was delighted to learn from these young 
people, since they see the world with eyes that have not been dulled over the 
years. Their vision is still fresh and open.

I attended UC Santa Cruz many years ago, and I remember other students whose 
parents had never attended college. For some it was initially intimidating or 
too challenging; some continued, while others dropped out.

The town of Santa Cruz is within an hour’s drive of many agricultural 
communities like Watsonville and Salinas, where children often grow up without 
encouragement to attend college and find professional careers. Some of the 
Ethics Bowl students were apparently on a college campus for the first time 
ever, and for others, it was their first time participating in a serious 
academic exercise.

The beauty of the Ethics Bowl is that it gives these teenagers a taste of 
college life without requiring tests, admissions, acceptance. It’s just a 
weekend spent in a new environment not far from home, engaging with other 
students. But it’s an event that can open a world of new possibilities.

Why Does This Matter?

The last point is perhaps the most important: we currently live in a world that 
is fractured, adversarial and increasingly divided up into regions, camps and 
tribes, all shouting at each other across widening divides. We tend to live in 
“echo chambers” that encourage us to communicate mostly with those who agree 
with us. For a democratic society, this is toxic and destructive.

The Ethics Bowl is hopefully one way to pry the lid off of our echo chambers 
and let it some fresh, different and even contradictory ideas and beliefs. If 
today’s teenagers grow up with experience in speaking, listening and 
communicating with others, we’ll all be the beneficiaries.

Learn More About the Ethics Bowl and the UC Santa Cruz Center for Public 
Philosophy

An all-day event hosting a hundred high school students for dozens of managed 
sessions requires a lot of work, planning and coordination. Kudos to the staff 
and volunteers at UC Santa Cruz, the coaches, the parents and all the 
participants for a successful and impressive event.

Learn more and get involved.

The UCSC Ethics Bowl is sponsored by the Center for Public Philosophy:

To learn about the UC Santa Cruz Ethics Bowl activities:

To learn more about the nationwide Ethics Bowl agenda and how you might get 
involved in your area:

Note: The National High School Ethics Bowl is modeled on the Intercollegiate 
Ethics Bowl (IEB), which is sponsored by the Association for Practical and 
Professional Ethics.


Sent from my iPhone

-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to