Utopia and Politics

Chris Stirewalt recently cited a comment of the late Charles Krauthammer that 
is important

in the context of Radical Centrism. The occasion for the comment was the 
Savannah

Book Festival, one of an increasing number of such gatherings around the country

which bring together authors and the educated public for mutual advantage.

C-Span telecasts about 20 such book festivals each year and I try to watch

at least some of each such festival when they come along, at least those

that feature speakers or panels of experts that talk about  issues that

are important to me.


About Krauthammer, by the way, he is someone I miss greatly for his original 
thoughts

on just about every topic. He could be wrong, of course, and sometimes he

was far off the mark, but he was original in the 90% range, and without 
originality

you can't have productive politics.


The quote, or close paraphrase, was this:


"Politics is like the wall and the moat around a medieval city.  Politics is 
what

protects the city from the barbarians outside."


Get the politics wrong and what happens is that the moat is bridged and the 
walls collapse,

and the barbarians get inside and destroy the city, that is, they ruin 
families, they ruin

the economy, they ruin the environment, they ruin countless lives. Which is 
precisely

why Radical Centrists need to be as well informed about politics as there is 
time for

in anyone's hectic life.


The metaphor has its limitations, as do all metaphors or analogies or figures 
of speech.

For instance, the "barbarians" are already inside,  in the form of criminals, 
stupid

or uneducated people, psychologically damaged people, people with dysfunctional 
values,

and so forth.  Moreover, politics can take a myriad forms., To take the 
original metaphor

further, politics is also the weaponry of the soldiers defending the city, it 
is the chain

of command of the soldiers, it is the stockpile of supplies needed to withstand 
a siege,

and all of that. But you surely get the idea.


Bad politics and you get bad outcomes, and the city falls.  That is, the Roman 
Empire

gradually falls apart, or the Aztecs, despite all their wealth and the size of 
their armies,

prove unable to withstand the aggression of the very small Spanish forces 
arrayed

against them. Or, to use a Biblical example, you get the destruction of 
Jerusalem

at the hands of the Babylonians.


The outcome of bad politics is not pretty, it is ugly and tragic.


To be sure, it is easy to understand why, on one level, politics seems like a 
waste

of time.  What good is my one vote? What good are my ideas against a juggernaut

of media power with a huge budget that network TV and the big newspapers

and every other communications media uses at will?  Also, too much time

spent on politics, arguing about, say,  foreign policy, when you or I or anyone 
else

has so little influence on the outcome, seems pointless, is time poorly spent.


I get that, I really get that.


However, what is Radical Centrism all about?  Ultimately we want to replace

the existing rotten and dysfunctional political system with something that

is far superior.  But for any such thing to be remotely possible it is vital

to understand actual messy, dirty, crass politics as it is experienced in the 
real world.


Politics is not Plato's Republic.  That book has the same relationship to 
politics,

by way of analogy, as a foetus in the womb does to a grown man or woman

who is married with a family. Yes, it is a good thing when the infant-to-be

is healthy and all the biological parts are in place, where they should be.

But the grown adult cannot look at all like a foetus at 12 weeks, and

it is essential, in any case, to think about prenatal care, about hospital 
bills,

about good nutrition, about baby clothes, about diapers, about all kinds of

details that have nothing at all to do with that tiny creature in a mother's

abdomen. In other words, politics is all that stuff that makes it possible

for the foetus to become a baby and then grow to maturity.


I don't know about Plato's Republic. Maybe Thomas more's Utopia is a better 
model,

or maybe one or another mythology like that of Shangri-La or Xanadu or El 
Dorado.

Or, s'il vous plait, The City of God or the civilization described in Bellamy's

Looking Backward (from the good future to our troubled present). In any case,

we need some vision of a "utopia."  The vision gives us purpose and ideas

to try and live up to.  But that only is the start of the process. We absolutely

must have all the other stuff, everything necessary to get to Xanadu,  to

any ideal future we really hope to see.


Which is also to say that any image of utopia, or Xanadu, will necessarily be

modified greatly in proportion to what is realistically possible as a political

movement starts to try and build it.


But ignoring politics is guaranteed to bring about one certain outcome:

Complete inability to get anywhere near to Xanadu, ever.


For anyone not to understand this viscerally amazes me.


Of anyone on Earth Radical Centrists need command of political knowledge

as much as possible. Thorough, realistic, detailed knowledge of politics.


But how can apolitical animals become political animals?


It seems to me that RC needs to be redesigned from the ground up so that this

basic understanding is built into it as foundational, necessary, and desirable.

For without it you build sand castles in the air and nothing gets done.



For now there isn't much that I can do except point such things out. But I am

thinking ahead to  -with luck-  a future when there are actual resources to 
work with

and there is opportunity to create a movement based on principles of Radical 
Centrism.

At such time I would want to surround myself with people who understand culture

at a level of detail, who understand economics, who understand modern 
technology,

and who understand politics with the best of the political class anywhere.


For the way I conceive of politics it is that politics, in essence, while it can

be other things, is most of all a form of WAR.


This is not open for debate.



Billy



-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to