Reflections on history



People have no idea how it pains me to discuss current events.

Well, OK, sometimes current events can be fun, but speaking generally.

Usually I am  FAR more interested in Plutarch or Artaxerxes or

James Madison than I am in giving a second thought to Trump

or Hillary or any other limelighter in today's news.


Ask any professional historian; the past is one's passion. The past is

never dead, the people in it are still alive, and it all counts greatly.

And if you don't get it, you are a dunce, an idiot, a dolt,

and what good are you, anyway?



For "normal" people if it is more than, say, 3 or 4 years in the past, it may as

well be the Age of Dinosaurs. Who cares who won the Civil War? Someone won it

and we are alive now and that stuff doesn't matter any more.



As I was just saying to Teddy Roosevelt the other day, a lot of people are 
really stupid.


---------------



What has brought all of this on was an interview on C-Span between the 
questioner,

a woman with India background named Aruna Viswanatha, and minor political 
celebrity

(or political knave, take your pick) George Papadopoulous.


My eyes rolled to the ceiling. This can't be real, can it?  I remembered my 
youth

in Eisenhower-era Chicago. My friends had names like Johnson, Olson, Carter, 
Ramey,

Schrieber, Hintz, Bevin, Cummings, etc., or sometimes Berlowitz or Ostroff

or Helen Augenlicht (a terrific girl who shared my sense of humor).


"Rojas" was an outlier, nobody in the neighborhood had a Spanish name, nobody.

For that matter my family was almost the only Rojas in Chicago. How many are 
there now?

10,000? 25,000? Some number like that.


As a college student I did know one Greek, a friendship that came and went

and good riddance, but at the time it was real enough. Anyway, he had the good 
sense

to have a pronounceable name, Kontos, which was easy to remember.


These days everything has changed.


There was one name,  a scholar from Sri Lanka (Ceylon at the time) named

Malalasekera, whom I heard speak at a forum of religion scholars in the city,

but I could always bring that one to mind well enough because it was so poetic.


So, I decided to listen in to the interview between Viswanatha and Papadopoulous

out of curiosity. Surely neither would understand the other and it would

all be a lot of laughs.


Both spoke flawless American, like they had lived next door to me in Chicago

and also attended Nettlehorst grammar school. Which was almost the case

since Papadopoulus is a Chicagoan himself.  Viswanatha is from some remote

fastness like Ohio or Wisconsin or other exotic land.


Papadopoulous has a new book out; sorry, I have no interest in reading it and 
will

content myself with perusing writings of a distant ancestor of his like maybe 
Plato

(which is a lot easier to spell) but the interview had its own interest.


I'm rather glad I heard it. I still think that "George" (let me drop the 
Papadopoulous

since it takes me 2 minutes to type it out) is self-serving in much of what he 
says,

but it now is clear that he does have a case to make and that some of what he 
reported

has value of its own.


Guess what? The FBI lies to people and does so with impunity. I already knew 
this,

to be sure. I recall a time when I lived in Arizona and was visited by two 
agents.

It seems that the head of my dissertation committee had been murdered.

What did I know?


Nothing in any way relevant to his death, and, needless to say, I was 
approximately

a million miles distant from the location of his murder and had not seen him

in about 10 years at that time, but then came the bombshell.  Dan Jordan

was killed by homosexuals. What did I think of that?  I didn't know what

to think. I did know his wife, Nancy, and he had two kids, and from all

that I remembered his family life was very good if not excellent.

So, the agents left and that episode faded away for the time being.


Until 2002 or so, here in Eugene. At that time I visited the local Baha'i Center

to talk with the Baha'is about my past membership. I had resigned in 1973

but they wanted to verify this. OK, and I recall thinking that it would be

a good time to find out what I could about Dan Jordan's death. Had the case

finally been solved? I still remembered Dan fondly as a friend.


"What do you mean he was murdered by homosexuals?" I was asked with

incredulity. "The FBI told us he was killed by Muslim militants."


Either the FBI lied to me or the FBI lied to the Baha'is.


So, kindly keep this in mind if the FBI has approached you in any capacity.

They just may have (gasp) lied to you, also.


George recalled several instances when the FBI lied to him as well, even though

at first he could not believe it. At that point, which turned out to be his 
comprehension

that he was being willfully misled, he asked himself, this is a quote from the 
interview,

"why would the  FBI lie to me?'


Another time the FBI introduced (through a third party) George to a niece of 
Vladimir Putin.

By that time George was co-operating with the Bureau, this was before he 
discovered

a different lie and was trying to help out  -partly to seek to escape prison 
time. The FBI

wanted to use any link that young George might make with the niece in order to 
further

their investigation of the Trump campaign and its possible links to Russia.

Some time later, George learned that Putin is an only child with no brothers

or sisters. Niece?  O, yeah?


Then there was the gag order that George had to obey despite, by then,

knowing all kinds of stuff that the public had every right to know.


What would I do if I was under a gag order which, it became clear,

was obtained on grossly unethical grounds and which obviously served

political interests with no serious stake in the truth?


No idea how I would do it, and I sure in Hell would cover myself

and be sure to have completely legitimate grounds in the process,

but no way would I allow flagrant falsehood to prevail. Which, for

the benefit of any lurker who likes to pass along such things, says

absolutely nothing but that, I trust, makes my message

sufficiently clear:  I will never, under any circumstances, allow

anyone to lie about the philosophy of Henri Saint-Simon.


Thanks, George, for the head's up.



Billy

Case File # 34789 A8  N5-1










-- 
-- 
Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community 
<[email protected]>
Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/RadicalCentrism
Radical Centrism website and blog: http://RadicalCentrism.org

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Centroids: The Center of the Radical Centrist Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to