On 6/30/2015 4:29 PM, Eugene Lee wrote:
Do you intend on doing everything across the board? If not, I'd go for a bladerf. 
USB3>2.

At first glance the USB 3.0 vs USB 2.0 argument sounds good, but doesn't
hold water.  I've only slightly followed along, but USB 3.0 has been
somewhat of a rocky road for a number of devices.

But putting that aside, the (original) context was ham radio, bladeRF
starts at 300 Mhz, so no VHF and is 20 MSPS vs 40 MSPS going to make
a difference 90+% of ham related applications?

I did notice the HamShield is aiming for 250 milliwatt output power.

What's the output power of the BladeRF?  (or HackRF for that matter)


_______________________________________________
Radio mailing list [email protected]
https://list.hackmanhattan.com/listinfo/radio

Reply via email to