rsaskew;496980 Wrote: > I think fiddly doesn't begin to do justice to this device. I'd describe > it as a geek's wet dream and an average consumer's horror show. I wish > I'd spent an hour on this forum before buying a SBR. Maybe in a couple > of year's this device will be ready for prime time, but for now appears > to be a cool toy that can do a lot of different things for a wide range > of user needs, for people who who don't mind temperamental technology. > Unfortunately it can't do the basics simply and reliably.
I have to agree with you. SBR is a brilliant concept, just poorly implemented in it's early version. This is not unusual for a first version of a new product. Hopefully, once customer feedback gets listened to and analyzed, future software upgrades will make is more user-friendly and much more stable. The hardware seems capable, with the exception of the lack of a battery backup for the alarm clock. It was actually a lot less of a geek-required product that I expected. I expected a Linux-like experience (much assembly required) and instead got a Windows-3 experience (easy-to-get-going, but largely broken). -- davenva ------------------------------------------------------------------------ davenva's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34191 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=72722 _______________________________________________ Radio mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/radio
