You must not have tried the 'easy' solution I gave. Run it and then look up the operator precedence rules in the manual.
Also note, these are expressions that are evaluated into one machine and not rules in the usual sense. Adrian ------Original Message------ From: Dmitry Marakasov Sender: To: [email protected] ReplyTo: [email protected] Sent: Feb 9, 2009 5:43 PM Subject: Re: [ragel-users] Actions embedded into unexpected transitions? * Adrian Thurston ([email protected]) wrote: > I still can't see the problem. Can you restate it, if it's still an issue? It still is. The problem in the behaviour of mentioned machine: %%{ machine foo; a = 'a'+; b = a 'b'+; main := b+; }%% - Logically. Rule `b' contains rule `a', and no other rule contains `a'. Thus, you only can enter `a' from `b', thus `enter a' action should always be executed after `enter b'. - In practice Rule a is entered Rule a is left Rule b is entered Rule b is left That seem illogical to me. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D [email protected] ..: jabber: [email protected] http://www.amdmi3.ru _______________________________________________ ragel-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users _______________________________________________ ragel-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users
