I'm expecting to go up to 6.10 and beyond, but that won't happen for at least a year.
Adrian Diego Elio “Flameeyes” Pettenò wrote: > Since in the side branch we're currently working on we need a newer > version of Ragel (6.6, as 6.5 crashes on our code), I've implemented > some basic version checking, so that a project can ask a minimum Ragel > version it works with. > > This has one catch though: it assumes that the current scheme of x.y > with y < 10 is kept indefinitely. For obvious reasons this might not be > that absolute so I should probably look to solve this in a more sensible > way. > > On the other hand it should work great on the short term, which is > exactly what I was looking for right now. > > HTH, > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > ragel-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users _______________________________________________ ragel-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users
