No, because ragel does not ever skip any bytes before trying to match.
Similarly, if you supply additional data to a state machine that is in
the final state, it will move to the error state.
On 11-04-08 09:09 AM, Vladimir VG wrote:
Is there in Ragel equivalent regexp's $ ^ patterns?
_______________________________________________
ragel-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users
--
Dr. Adrian D. Thurston
http://www.complang.org/thurston/
_______________________________________________
ragel-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users
