Just adding some context for my earlier post The org mode thread http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/53735
The org-mode gsoc project http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/gsoc2012/orgmode-gsoc2012-ideas.html#sec-1-3 On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Rustom Mody <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Aurélien Aptel > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> So, as an experienced org-mode developper you're saying it's very >> hard? I should focus on the ragel part in the application and try to >> go as far as i can for org-mode then. I still need something I can be >> evaluated to for the mid-term and final evaluation. >> >> Can you be my mentor? If no one can I should apply for another project :/ >> > > I am rather far from being an org mode developer; just a user. > > Adding a ragel backend for elisp on its own is too small for a gsoc project > Using ragelized elisp to rewrite orgmode is a wonderful project, but large. > > The best solution is to chalk out a subset of the latter and work at that > > Ive cced the ragel list in case Adrian Thurston, the ragel author, thinks > differently > > For the first Adrian and the ragel list is your best bet. > For the second the orgmode list and developers. > > For myself I am interested and would like to be informed. I dont think I > know enough of the internals of either to be the sole responsible party. >
_______________________________________________ ragel-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users
