No worries. If there are any ideas of a sensible way to procede in tackling the problem I'd be happy to take a stab at it when time permits (I've had some ideas, but I'm not very happy with them so far).
thanks Dan On Jun 11, 2012, at 23:57, "Adrian Thurston" <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't have a timeline at this point. I'm not sure if anyone else is working > on it. > > Regards, > Adrian > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 09:44:09AM +0930, Dan Kortschak wrote: >> Can I ask what the status of this development is? And whether there is a >> framework for resolving this that someone could contribute to. >> >> thanks >> Dan Kortschk >> >>> But that said, it will probably get done soonish because I'm currently >>> working on ragel 7.0, including the code generators. It will be a good >>> time to get it done. >>> >>> -Adrian >>> >>> On 11-07-18 04:25 AM, Miek Gieben wrote: >>>> [ Quoting Adrian Thurston at 19:41 on July 17 in "Re: [ragel-users] Go >>>> code generatio"... ] >>>>> http://www.complang.org/redmine/issues/307 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ragel-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users > > _______________________________________________ > ragel-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users _______________________________________________ ragel-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users
