On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 01:00:15PM -0400, Bob Paddock wrote: > > For win64, > > fairly extensive changes would be needed since colm assumes pointers = long > > data type, but in windows pointers = long long. > > I've not looked at the code in question, so don't know if this helps. > > Pointers should not be long nor long long they should be size_t . > > See <stddef.h> and <stdint.h>. > > When we move to 128 bit parts we'd have to go down this road again, > that is what size_t is meant to prevent. It is the difference between > memory space and arithmetic bit widths. >
This isn't true in C. In C the only well-defined way to convert a pointer to an integer and back again is via intptr_t or uintptr_t. Does C++ really require the same behavior for size_t? _______________________________________________ ragel-users mailing list ragel-users@complang.org http://www.complang.org/mailman/listinfo/ragel-users
