Hey !

2005/12/9, Francois Beausoleil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2005/12/7, Francois Beausoleil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > In the end, we're trying to keep the principle of least surprise
> > active.  What's less suprising:
>
> So, what do we do ?  We could also take the status quo, and just add
> the patch as-is, meaning relationships would prevent reusing existing
> method names, but columns are not.

Any takers on this ?

--
François Beausoleil
http://blog.teksol.info/
_______________________________________________
Rails-core mailing list
Rails-core@lists.rubyonrails.org
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-core

Reply via email to