redirect_to :previous reads very well. On 1/8/06, Duane Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 8, 2006, at 8:10 PM, Kevin Clark wrote: > > > I'm bumping this and asking for someone (anyone really) to give me > > some feedback on whether this would be acceptable syntax for allowing > > for fallback with redirect_to :back. > > redirect_to :back, :controller => 'alternative_controller', > > :action =>'alt_action' > > redirect_to :back, 'http://alternative.url.test.host/blah' > > > I wonder if some other method would work better? redirect_to :back > sounds so un-english. > > Suggestions: > redirect_to :previous, :controller => > 'alternative_controller', :action => 'alt_action' > redirect_to :referring_url, :controller => > 'alternative_controller', :action => 'alt_action' > redirect_back_otherwise :controller => ... > > sound better to me. I'd really like to see this in the core. > > Duane Johnson > (canadaduane) > http://blog.inquirylabs.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Rails-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-core >
-- Tobi http://jadedpixel.com - modern e-commerce software http://typo.leetsoft.com - Open source weblog engine http://blog.leetsoft.com - Technical weblog _______________________________________________ Rails-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-core
