* Michael Koziarski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060220 14:09]: > On 2/20/06, Kyle Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What if, instead of a simple integer sequence, migrations used timestamps? > > Could we do that in a backwards compatible way? The problem of local, > uncommited migrations isn't something that's worth breaking backwards > compatibility
Well, if it were done as an epoch timestamp (i.e., number of seconds since 1/1/1970) it would probably be pretty simple. Rick -- http://www.rickbradley.com MUPRN: 640 | the discipline of random email haiku | the folks that wrote it than | the language itself. _______________________________________________ Rails-core mailing list Rails-core@lists.rubyonrails.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-core
