> So you're saying "cool" isn't a benefit in itself. ;-) > > > (But of course, I agree, if it's not backwards compatible it shouldn't be > done.)
I agree too, and the change currently being proposed is backwards compatible for exactly this reason. David's rake -T concerns wouldn't be reason enough to break backwards compatibility, but it turns out that they can be satisfied anyway. -- Cheers Koz _______________________________________________ Rails-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-core
