I've just sent an aggregated patch for AWS to DHH that fixes these two tickets and many more. I hope he'll have some time to look at it.
If anybody wants to look at it, I can send it to the list. Kent. On 2/26/06, Michael Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is he alive? Does anyone know if he's OK? > > Leon's fine. He's just overworked at the dayjob. > > > I agree that for something to be in core it must be maintainable by > > known maintainers. I assume Leon fell into that category, without (I > > guess) being in the core team. > > Leon was in the core team, it's just that he hasn't had time to > contribute in the meantime. > > > Do you know the figures here? Without daring to tread on the ground of > > "is Rails enterprise-ready?" I would point out that being able to offer > > functionality either through a Web UI or via a web service is a big > > enterprise "tick in the box". > > Well ActionPack's REST support is pretty complete at present. But if > someone's able to start fixing the show stoppers like these, then we > can definitely continue to include it: > > http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/2553 > http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3567 > > etc. > > > > Personally, I believe that anything up to Rails 2.0 should respect the > > commitment to "not break the Book (AWDR)". At the very least, there > > should be a succession of versions that warn the user before something > > actually breaks. > > > > Perhaps you should go through the book and publish the "truck number"[1] > > of each feature. > > It's not really a question of 'truck numbers' (nice phrase though), > but rather that AWS is broken now, and noone has stepped up to the > plate to take over maintenance. I'd definitely prefer to continue to > include AWS in rails, at least until rails 2.0, but in it's current > state, it's just too broken. > > If you're using AWS in production at present, please consider looking > into the tickets and providing fixes. That's the best way to ensure > that AWS stays in rails. > > > regards > > > > Justin > > > > [1] Truck Number - the number of people who would need to be run over by > > a truck to render a given feature unviable. > > _______________________________________________ > > Rails-core mailing list > > Rails-core@lists.rubyonrails.org > > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-core > > > > > -- > Cheers > > Koz > _______________________________________________ > Rails-core mailing list > Rails-core@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-core > -- Kent --- http://www.datanoise.com _______________________________________________ Rails-core mailing list Rails-core@lists.rubyonrails.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-core
