On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 11:46:13PM -0700, Josh Susser wrote: > Most of these aren't worth describing - they just refer to the topic > of the ticket, and in some cases are redundant with the component or > other settings of the ticket. It looks like there are only a few > keywords that matter: > > fd, needs_review, test, documentation/docs, tiny, tested > > I suppose "patch" might deserve to be on that list too, though it's > redundant with the [PATCH] notation in the summary field. > > If no one has any others to offer, I'll go with that list.
Those are indeed about the only keywords that have an ordained significance. There isn't really a rigorous list. Some keywords are only to be assigned by core though. One example is 'fd'. There is also the 'risky' keyword (http://dev.rubyonrails.org/report/18). Basically, if there isn't a customized report for the keyword here (http://dev.rubyonrails.org/report) then the keyword will likely not be used much. No need for a patch keyword. [PATCH] does the job. The keywords are a way to organize [PATCH]es. Thanks for your efforts Josh. marcel -- Marcel Molina Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Rails-core mailing list Rails-core@lists.rubyonrails.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-core
