On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 11:38:03AM -0700, Josh Susser wrote: > > On Jun 1, 2006, at 7:03 AM, David Heinemeier Hansson wrote: > > >>What is the current process the core team uses for accepting patches > >>and handling tickets? There are a few loose notes somewhere about > >>this, but it might be good to publish this somewhere so people know > >>what to expect. > > > >There's no formal procedure per se. The ticket has to be tested, > >follow style conventions, be backwards compatible, and hopefully > >something that has meaning for most people most of the time. But all > >of these rules go out the window some times, if there's a stroke of > >genius found in the submission. > > That's good to know, and pretty much what I expected to hear too. > But I'm curious about how much people use the Trac reports. Does > anyone really sit down and look at the Unprocessed Patches report to > figure out what patches to look at? If someone submits a patch with > the e.g. "tiny" keyword, that puts it in the Tiny report - does that > mean it might not get, um, processed? I'm just now writing up some > notes on keywords and it would be useful to tell folks whether adding > those keywords helps or hinders their effords.
I use the reports but not religiously. I use them once-in-a-whilely. On the occasion when I do, though, it is appreciated and allows me to quickly process a lot of tickets. marcel -- Marcel Molina Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Rails-core mailing list Rails-core@lists.rubyonrails.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-core
