I don't think we should reduce that sort of spam. The point is that it's annoying so it gets fixed. Maybe we can put something in the subject though so those of us who don't care about oracle and pgsql breaking can filter it out?
Kev On 7/8/06, Blair Zajac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ideally, if you could have the same person manage Oracle and other databases, then you could have the Oracle tests run, and if they pass, run the Postgresql tests. While this would delay the report of Postgresql specific problems when there is also an Oracle specific problem, it would reduce spam. We have Postgresql and Oracle at work, or perhaps Michael, who reports the Oracle tests, could set it up for Postgresql? Regards, Blair On Jul 8, 2006, at 9:03 AM, Mislav Marohnić wrote: > Having both Postgres and SQL server in addition to Oracle autotest > results on the list would spam it pretty much, I think. What do > others think? > > On 7/8/06, Rick Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We have some > interest in providing the same service for Postgres -- > would you be so kind as to forward me a copy of your script and we'll > see if we can get a Postgres test server set up (unless there are some > objections by people on the core list). _______________________________________________ Rails-core mailing list Rails-core@lists.rubyonrails.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-core
-- Kevin Clark http://glu.ttono.us
_______________________________________________ Rails-core mailing list Rails-core@lists.rubyonrails.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-core
