nenad-vujicic left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#5904)
> > 1. for keeping note versions like it is done for other elements (nodes,
> > ways and relations)
>
> I continue to think that this is not a good idea, for starters notes are
> _not_ like or even the same class of entity as OSM elements.
>
> Then in the current model, if you so want, notes are ledger-like (think
> block-chain), you are adding entries to a sequential list with immutable
> entries, versions literally don't fit in to such a model, nor is there even
> any kind of indication why we would need versions and what they would be
> useful for.
@simonpoole thanks for feedback! Just to clarify your idea, is #5344 plus
update functionality (we would have new event type - `update`) something you
would like? I believe we could add to "(special) update comment" changes we
made (description, lat / lon, tags) if we want to have note's provenance and it
will not make Discussion thread too dirty (in that case Discussion will be more
History than discussion :worried:).
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/5904#issuecomment-2858404227
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
<openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/pull/5904/c2858404...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
rails-dev mailing list
rails-dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/rails-dev
