1ec5 left a comment (openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website#1807)

> My suggestion for next steps is to adopt the syntax `geo:$x,$y;u=$u` as a 
> Latitude/Longitude input. For example, `geo:-23.55,-46.63;u=15`.

#1123 tracks accepting a geo: URI as search input.

The topic of standing up a companion website probably deserves a separate 
discussion, perhaps in [osm-planning](https://github.com/osmlab/osm-planning/) 
or [operations](https://github.com/openstreetmap/operations/) (if you foresee 
the OWG or OSMF taking an active role in this), or better yet, somewhere like 
[the forum](https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/plus-codes/84969) where 
people are used to discussions going off in many very interesting tangents.

Same goes with the topic of grid references inside geo: URIs. If there’s 
already a standard affordance for grid references inside geo: URIs, then we 
could track providing that URI as part of the Share panel alongside the 
existing geo: URI, but that needs to be a separate issue. Otherwise, it 
probably wouldn’t be very useful for this site to unilaterally accept grid 
reference geo: URIs that no one else produces yet, so there’s some groundwork 
to do outside of this project.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/1807#issuecomment-2867089812
You are receiving this because you commented.

Message ID: 
<openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/1807/2867089...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
rails-dev mailing list
rails-dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/rails-dev

Reply via email to