2008/9/20 Sven Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Although there are a couple of partial solutions [1] all of them have > some kind of annoying shortcoming, be it that one can not use non- > named, old-school routes with it or even has to pass lots of > parameters to url_for in certain cases and none of them gave me the > flexibility i wanted.
Hi Sven, Please excuse my insistence - I wrote a message about this just yesterday - but there is another solution which, as you propose, wraps around the routing system and manages helpers on a very confortable way: http://github.com/raul/translate_routes/ During the last months I've received some feedback from european and latin-american developers and they are using it succesfully on production environments, so it's a bit more mature than your experimental suggestion. Maybe it could be a more solid base to build on, what do you think about it? -- Raul Murciano - Freelance Web Developer http://raul.murciano.net --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rails-i18n" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
