Rails uses

rake rails:update

Shouldn't we stick to that?

rake i18n:update

OR

rake rails:update:i18n

?

On 27 dez, 16:12, Sébastien Grosjean - ZenCocoon
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree, a simple way to update core translations files would be more
> than appreciated.
>
> --
>   Sebastien Grosjean - ZenCocoon
>
> On Dec 27, 2:44 pm, "Yaroslav Markin" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I think that would be just great to merge this in, thanks for your work :-)
> > I also think that locale checking tool must move to rails-core as rake
> > i18n:check of something. What do you think, people?
>
> > On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Andreas Neuhaus <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > As a result of looking for an easier way to pull in core translations
> > > from Sven's rails-i18n repository into my own apps, I refactorerd his
> > > repository so that it can now be used as a Rails plugin. Installing
> > > rails-i18n as a plugin automatically pulls in core translations for
> > > locales used by the application. This makes it easier to manage Rails
> > > core translations in an app (e.g. simply update the plugin to get new/
> > > udated core translations).
>
> > > My fork of the repository is athttp://github.com/zargony/rails-i18n.
> > > What do you think?
>
> > --
> > Yaroslav Markin
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"rails-i18n" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to