On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Sven Fuchs <svenfu...@artweb-design.de>wrote:
> > I've just talked to Pratik and he agreed that 2-3-stable is the best > place to target right now as we want to have this in 2.3.x anyway. > There's no problem with porting this to AM/2.3.x and AR/AM master/3.0 > then. > > Pratik said that the currently most current version of AM is in the > active_model branch, not the current master branch. (He said he > updated the active_model branch quite recently.) Right; upon closer inspection, it seems that the active model errors code in master is actually quite old, which is probably why it doesn't contain the I18n code. > Looking briefly over active_model this code looks quite familar: > http://github.com/rails/rails/blob/5f3f100ce2d689480da85abc88e5e940cf90189e/activemodel/lib/active_model/errors.rb > > But AM is definitely the most moving part in the game. So let's start > with AR in 2-3-stable and work from there. > > wdyt? Works for me. What would be the best way to proceed regarding patches, opening a ticket on lighthouse? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rails-i18n" group. To post to this group, send email to rails-i18n@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rails-i18n+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-i18n?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
