On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Mike Bailey <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Joshua Partogi<[email protected]> > wrote: > > I thought about this too. Sorry for getting out of topic a bit. If > everybody > > know that Solo or Heroku is much more expensive than VPS hosting like > > Linode, is there anything that I gain from using Solo or Heroku? > > Solo and Heroku give you a web interface for installing your app (and > all required packages). > Solo runs on Amazon ec2 instances. The base is 1.7GB RAM but can go up > to about 16.5 GB I think. > Really interesting comment. Thanks Mike. I'm using a VPS myself. Having said that, I'm interested whether there is anyone is using Rails as intranet webapp or non 24/7 site? Because IMHO that EC2 plan is only suitable if you're not running 24/7 webapp. Otherwise I can not see what I'll be gaining instead of just using VPS. It's a shame AppEngine is not available for Ruby :-(. I really like how they only charge per bandwith that is used. Kind Regards, -- Join Scrum8.com. http://blog.scrum8.com http://twitter.com/scrum8 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
