I completely agree. The overly 3d use of these technologies is not much more than a gimick, but it is also a culmination of many different technologies that each could be of some use individually.
Sent from my iPhone On 15/07/2009, at 10:00 AM, James Salter <[email protected]> wrote: > > 3d is great fun, but .. consider that far more advanced 3d potential > has been available on the desktop for a while - yet desktop apps are > overwhelmingly still 2d and usually use a minimum of 3d effects. > Mainly because of usability and accessibility realities; presenting > the data in a 2d plane is just more efficient in 99% of cases and 3d > is just garnish. > > Revolution? yeah maybe for say, band websites, but I'm sceptical this > is a big deal for anyone trying to develop web apps with complexity > anywhere above trivial. > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
