On 6/12/09 10:53 PM, sambo99 wrote: > I just spent a day upgrading my code to be a bit more 1.9.1 friendly, > surprisingly few code changes work required on my side. > > But it did feel like a bit of a minefield getting the periphery going > see: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1666094/has-anyone-successfully-deployed-a-rails-project-with-ruby-1-9-1/1855167#1855167 > > Is it just me, or is 1.9.1 still a bit early for production use? We're not running in prod on 1.9, but I got our code base working with it, including all the bits and pieces. Needed to patch a few gems, but that's good for your soul :)
> > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
