They kind of hint to it if you use the webmaster tools

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Keith Pitt <[email protected]> wrote:

> They dont actually state what they consider to be a fast site.
>
> They do suggest Page Speed in the article,  so I assume that they use a
> deriviate of Page Speed to do the rankings. They wouldn't suggest "Oh hi,
> we're ranking based on the server response time" then turn around and offer
> you links to Client side speed testing tools (I think)
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:49 PM, Ben Schwarz <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> A you've thrown up a pretty big, general "what if?" query here Andy, its
>> somewhat invalid.
>>
>> Speaking also, very generally, if you take those simple guidelines from
>> Nate Cockley's presentation and apply them - your site will be as fast as it
>> needs to be 95% of the time.
>>
>> Google have indeed started ranking based on response speed (stated here:
>> http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/04/using-site-speed-in-web-search-ranking.html
>> )
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Andrew Snow <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ben Schwarz wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'd like to throw in two points:
>>>>    * More than 80% of performance in the browser is directly related to
>>>>      what you do on the front-end
>>>>
>>>
>>> This seems to be over-generalised.  What if my server-side CMS is poorly
>>> written and some pages are taking seconds to render on the server?
>>>
>>> I'd imagine Google are only looking at server response time for the
>>> purposes of ranking, and not client-side rendering or execution time.
>>>
>>> (Would be interesting to see them penalise sites for being
>>> javascript-heavy, or using Flash!)
>>>
>>> - Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected]<rails-oceania%[email protected]>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<rails-oceania%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<rails-oceania%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
or Rails Oceania" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.

Reply via email to