sorry, it's obviously been too long since I did c++, you are right. I was
thinking about java with the inline public/private declarations.
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 07:40:50 +0800, Gregory McIntyre <[email protected]>
wrote:
Most Ruby features are modelled after some other language. This one is
like C++. I guess mostly it'd be Java programmers that would find this
irksome and un-POLS.
On 25 April 2010 12:00, Simon Macneall <[email protected]> wrote:
yes, but that then makes any method declared after the 'private' string
private. Which means that method declarations aren't self contained, you
need to know what has gone before in the file.
so
class Foo
def bar
:bar
end
private
def baz
:baz
end
def this_is_private_too
:doh
end
end
Simon
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 09:49:25 +0800, Nicholas Jefferson
<[email protected]> wrote:
One minor glitch that annoys me is that you can't declare a method
private in the method definition itself.
class Foo
def bar
:bar
end
private
def baz
:baz
end
end
foo = Foo.new
p foo.bar
p foo.baz
Thanks,
Nicholas
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
"Ruby or Rails Oceania" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or
Rails Oceania" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
