Maybe people are using twitter as an example why Rails is not scalable because it often went down.
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Mikel Lindsaar <[email protected]> wrote: > It usually just means: > > 5. The people implementing it didn't know what they were doing. > > On 20/08/2010, at 11:06 AM, Joshua Partogi wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I often hear people say that rails is not scalable. What does it mean >> by that exactly? >> >> Does it mean that: >> 1. Rails can not be clustered? >> 2. Rails can not handle many concurrent users? >> 3. The code gets messy when the apps gets larger? >> 4. The performance is not fast? >> >> I am still confused by these buzzword that I often hear in many >> forums. So what are they actually referring when they say rails is not >> scalable? >> >> Thanks for your feedback. >> >> Kind regards, >> Joshua. >> >> -- >> http://twitter.com/scrum8 >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en. > > -- http://twitter.com/scrum8 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby or Rails Oceania" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rails-oceania?hl=en.
